Just so everyone understands, me included (CORRECTED)

I assume you meant that they would be home against WSU and then at WSU in consecutive years (same with OSU, or whatever the combo of teams is). Or would they play in alternating years (WSU and OSU one year, UW and UO the next)?

So wait, next year we get to play at Oregon, at Utah, at USC, at Stanford, and at Arizona? Are you kidding me? That can't be right. Is this a hypothetical schedule, or what it WILL look like? And I am guessing we also get to play at Houston and host Texas?

I can't even begin to be optimistic about next year. We will be playing over half our games against ranked opponents, three of which will likely be Top-10. And Cal, ASU, Washington and Colorado aren't easy games either.

I thought next we were going to turn everything around?

At Oregon in back-to-back years? Ouch...

Seems like a strange schedule...we don't go to the state of Washington for 4 years but the state of Oregon doesn't come to UCLA for 4. Seems like they could have at least alternated so the WSU games were split one at home, one away during a 4 year period.

Wow next year is brutal, what are the non- conference games?

Jon someone e-mailed me and said the 2011 schedules won't be out for about a month. Could you provide a link to all the PAC-12 schedules?

This is hypothetical. It is not next year's schedule. We are hosting Texas, at Houston, and with the exception of USC, the PAC-12 schedule needs to be worked out. However, I imagine that it is possible we will face some of the teams we play on the road this year, next year as well.

Jon, i read this in the press release, "Scott said it was anticipated that Pac-12 schools would have football schedules for 2011 and 2012 worked out within the next month."

Ok I see UCLA and USC are locked in to play Stanford and Cal every year in this 5-2-2 model. So who are Utah and Colrado locked in with every year from the North Division and the Arizona Schools who are they locked in with to play every year from the north.