Montana 66, UCLA 57

| | Comments (8) |

* I'll have more analysis on the game tomorrow, but here's a quick write-up for deadline


Tyler Honeycutt had a perfect look, with perfect lift, and perfect rotation on the ball.
And the ball found the rim, and it spun, and it spun, and it spun, finally squirting out harmlessly to the floor with less than a minute to play.

And once again, UCLA proved to be a mystery.

Well, a riddle wrapped in a mystery wrapped in an enigma.
Only take that, and wrap that in a plastic bag, wrap that with 43 rubber bands, and bury it
smack in the middle of the Sahara.

Three days after losing at Kansas' vaunted Allen Fieldhouse by one - and a sketchy one, at that, as a much-questioned last-second foul call proved the difference - the Bruins fell to Montana 66-57 at Pauley Pavilion in front of 5,391.

"We deserved the boos," UCLA junior point guard Lazeric Jones said. "Our fans came to watch us play, and we didn't give them a good showing. I think a lot of people anticipated us to come out and play hard, especially after our game against Kansas. We did the exact opposite."

Given the way UCLA played offensively, perhaps Jones should not have been so shocked.
The Bruins shot 20-for-64 from the field, just 31 percent, and committed 16 turnovers, unable to convert even the easiest of baskets.

Leading scorers Tyler Honeycutt and Reeves Nelson, who came into the contest averaging a combined 33.2 points per game, combined for just 16 on 5-of-21 shooting. Against the Jayhawks on Thursday, Honeycutt had 33 alone.

"We did a very poor job of attacking their zone, without a lot of patience," Howland said. "We probably should have spent all our time yesterday on zone offense. We did not attack it well. We had a bunch of layups tonight we missed. Short, crippled shots. We were a step slow to everything."

A two-possession game at halftime quickly blew up on UCLA, as Montana pushed the ball with ease despite 17 turnovers. The Grizzlies jumped to a seven-point lead six minutes into the game as the Bruins found little offensive rhythm, looking disjointed in the half-court game against a Montana squad with ample size in the post.

With 7-footer Derek Selvig and 6-foot-11 center Brian Qvale (13 points) pounding UCLA's own big boys - freshman center Joshua Smith and sophomore forwards Brendan Lane and Nelson - the Grizzlies went into the half up 32-28.
It only got worse from there for the Bruins.

Montana shot 61 percent from the field in the second half, first punishing UCLA inside and then thriving in the running game when the Bruins tightened up. Point guard Will Cherry had a game-high 18 points, including 13 in the second half.

The Grizzlies led by as many as 17 with less than four minutes to play before a mini-UCLA run mercifully brought the Bruins to within double-digits.
"It's early, but it' a bad loss, no question," Howland said. "We have to control our future by having better practices. It's frustrating that it's now always a given.
"This was a nightmare deal."

UCLA' uneven play brought out the boo-birds for the first time this season, as the team was 3-0 at Pauley Pavilion before the loss. The defeat was the Bruins' fourth straight, as losses to Villanova and Virginia Commonwealth in the preseason NIT preceded the Kansas heartbreak and the Montana debacle.

Fans are now left wondering if the team will continue to tailspin, as it did last season, when the Bruins finished 14-18.
"The way we played, yeah (it reminded us of last year)," said UCLA junior guard Malcolm Lee, who led the team with 13 points. "Our capabilities, we could've played way better. I think we took this team just too lightly. Especially coming off a three-game losing streak. I think it was a hidden feeling that we almost beat Kansas."

8 Comments

hogsman Author Profile Page said:

An awful, ugly, disgusting loss. Montana is a decent team, but there is no excuse for such a blowout at home. The defense was nonexistent -- why can't the point guards stay in front of ANYBODY? I was one of many guilty of overestimating their showing vs. Kansas -- looking back at it, Kansas was sloppy and UCLA was up for the game. Against Montana, they looked like they just wanted to get the game over with -- Nelson looked like he was hung over, and Malcolm Lee's outside shot was just plain bad. Lamb looks like the best defender among the guards, which might be why he's getting so many minutes already. I'm hoping Coach lights a fire under their butts for the next game.

Anonymous said:

A tough 24 hours for the Bruins. SC Beats 20th ranked Texas.

ThaiMex Author Profile Page said:

Me thinks the TEXAS basketball team is as good in Basketball as the Texas Football Team was in Football..
comprende?

BigDBruin said:

I'll save the BH apologist time and provide their usual responses to this matter.

1) It's only one game!
2) We went to 3 straight final fours!
3) We lost too many players to the NBA!

mel said:

This whole athletic program is becoming a joke. Laughing after the football game. I said maybe we belong in the big sky conference. wrong again. we can't even compete with 1 AA teams now. RN and Holland are both jokes. Howland had 6 guys who are now starting in the NBA. Some staring in the NBA. Who the hell can't coach that kind of talent. although they won NOTHING here. AD has to go.

Rusty Buckets Author Profile Page said:

Sc loses to Texas 9 times out of 10. However, I disagree with Thai that the longhorns are not a good team. They are very young, but extremely talented. They will be one of the only teams to knock off Illinois, who I believe will be in the top 5 by season's end.

Spencer Author Profile Page said:

Jon, thanks for the post. However, I think you're missing an important component of the story. The loss against Kansas was an emotionally draining loss, they let it linger, and failed to prepare for Montana.

Warren said:

Well, in all fairness, the UCLA team couldn't use their hands the whole game, since they were probably still patting themselves on the back from that close Kansas loss.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

Stay on top of all UCLA sports with up-to-the-minute information and insight from Jon Gold and the rest of the Daily News sports staff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Gold published on December 5, 2010 9:47 PM.

UCLA v. USC Report Card was the previous entry in this blog.

A few thoughts is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Warren on Montana 66, UCLA 57: Well, in all fairness, the UCLA team couldn't use their hands the whol ...

Spencer on Montana 66, UCLA 57: Jon, thanks for the post. However, I think you're missing an important ...

Rusty Buckets on Montana 66, UCLA 57: Sc loses to Texas 9 times out of 10. However, I disagree with Thai th ...

mel on Montana 66, UCLA 57: This whole athletic program is becoming a joke. Laughing after the foo ...

BigDBruin on Montana 66, UCLA 57: I'll save the BH apologist time and provide their usual responses to t ...

ThaiMex on Montana 66, UCLA 57: Me thinks the TEXAS basketball team is as good in Basketball as the Te ...

Anonymous on Montana 66, UCLA 57: A tough 24 hours for the Bruins. SC Beats 20th ranked Texas. ...

hogsman on Montana 66, UCLA 57: An awful, ugly, disgusting loss. Montana is a decent team, but there ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement