Quick Chat with Brandon Huffman

Had a chance to chat with Scout.com West Recruiting Analyst Brandon Huffman, who’s working his way back from a brutal two-week stretch of just an insane amount of work. Props to Huffman for talking even though his voice still sounded like Vito Corleone. Eh, whatever, I made him offer he couldn’t refuse.

Here’s a breakdown of some of UCLA’s remaining targets: Check it Out

Gold: Not a lot of time left, and UCLA went 0-for-4 during the all-star games; should they have braced themselves for this?
Huffman: “I don’t think they were expecting a class like last year or the year before, just from a pure number standpoint. They don’t have a lot of scholarships to give. I dont think they ever expected a top-10 class or anything. But where they’re hurting is losing guys. You take Marc Mustoe. Not a killer loss, not a SoCal kid. Losing Brandin Cooks hurts, he was their first commitment, a guy in a position of need where they haven’t had a lot of good talent at. They didn’t do a good job recruiting there the later Dorrell years. It’s a position they have a lot of bodies at, but Cooks was the guy I thought could be an impact guy. Now they have to try to hold on to Torian White. (Those are) guys you wouldve thought were locked. But it just looks like they’re not getting the elite guys, and there aren’t a lot left.”

Gold: Yeah, but after two 4-8 seasons in three years, that can’t be too much of a surprise…
Huffman: “You’re absolutely right. Based upon what they’ve done on the field, you wonder how they’re able to pull in these elite guys. He pulls in an Owa on signing day, Marsh in the 11th hour, Josh Shirley late. They get some guys that you’d expect the 10-2, 11-1 teams to get. When it gets down toward signing day, it’s not a surpirse they’re not in it for a lot of those guys.”

Gold: So where do they go from here? Could you envision a small class, or would they go and offer guys who really weren’t at their level, whatever that may be?
Huffman: “The danger when you have a lot of scholarships left – and this is something Dorrell did and you’re seeing the effect – instead of storing them, you feel this need to fill all those scholarships. The problem is, you get to a class when you need those scholarships and you don’t have them. The wisest thing to do would be to take a gamble on one, two, three guys at the most. You need those scholarships for impact guys.
If you don’t, now you’re putting them back even more. I don’t think Neuheisel is looking at it like that. I think he’s thinking at it as I’m only going to use the scholarships for players who can play at this level.”

Gold: So it’s getting pretty late for some of the guys that UCLA is still in the running for, guys like Stefan McClure, Christian Heyward, Kevin McReynolds, etc.
Huffman: “The guy they’re doing the best on is McClure. I’d be surprised if he picks somewhere else. But he was feeling pretty good with Colorado with Ashley Ambrose, and with Ambrose at Cal, thats another obstacle. Christian Heyward, UCLA has fallen back with him, but he still plans to visit. Now he might look at Michigan and they need a defensive tackle, and there’s SDSU still. Kevin McReynolds is showing interest in Oregon, which can say, hey we just played in the national title game. With all these obstacles that UCLA has to overcome, it’s going to be tough.”

Gold: Obviously getting in a guy like Brett Hundley cures a lot of ills, but besides a few positions, UCLA seems to be hurting for players.
Huffman: “I definitely think UCLA is hurting at some positions. They just haven’t gotten the productivity out of the guys, and they’ve been playing a lot, so the younger guys are kind of waiting. And players talk to other players. That kind of stuff gets back to recruits. If they’re not using the guys who are there its, ‘How do I know that I’m going to get the fair shake?’ If not Hundley, its bordering on disaster. Its still not good, but youre talking about the titanic without Hundley.”

Share this post:Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page
  • Anonymous

    More crap from the doom and gloom BRO brothers of Pierson, Huffman, and Hicks. These guys have chased off more UCLA recruits than any losing record. They decide which coach should go and then beat thim into the ground with negativity. It’s one thing to give the opinion that a coach must go but to then mount a campaign to destroy that coach is a completely different matter. They did it with Toledo, Lavin, Dorrell, and others and in the process ran off recruits. Then, they and their minions ask why the program has sunk so low. I hope they don’t start it with Neuheisel. These fanboys turned “experts” are wannabes and I’m surprised that Gold takes so much stock in their opinions.

  • DoubleBruin

    Anonymous, I don’t follow BRO but the constant negativity is also very evident on some of the other blogs and I hope that it has little affect on our recruiting.

  • SB Bruin

    Actually, BRO’s editors are in Neuheisel’s corner. I think you may refer to the message board at BRO, but the editors (Tracy Pierson, Brandon Huffman) have been solidly and remain solidly in favor of Neuheisel.

  • Anonymous

    Finally, someone who has the COURAGE to talk truthfully about the state of the program!

  • Keptycho

    Hold on a minute. CRN is questionable as a coach but he is one heck of a recruiter. I think these guys talking gloom and doom about this year’s recruiting class are all wet. We just made a good hire for OC. If CRN can manage to get an established DC, like Fangio and a good receivers coach, that could entice some good talent. Let’s wait and see before we dis this class.

  • samohopar

    How does a program with no DC, no wide receivers coach, and a crypto OC expect to recruit anybody?

  • Anonymous

    I thought they were negative, but then I looked back at the last decade of Bruin football and I realized I was just a retard.