For better or for worse?

I guess it's about where I thought it would be, but I thought we would get there a bit differently, with wins over Montana and perhaps one of the other non-conference games that we lost but with a loss or two additionally in conference. Slightly better in conference, slightly worse non-conference record...

nice! you saved the trolls the time by giving them the option!

I guess it all depends on when you ask... About what I thought based on the beginning of the season. Better than what I thought after Montana.

I was going to vote for option 4 just because I love that you put it there, but opted for sanity instead.

"Laugh, and the world laughs with you; weep, and you weep alone." -Ella Wheeler

UCLA’s team is better than last year’s team as Kentwood is far from Belgrade.
I wouldn't be honest if I said current no. one seed Kansas, after getting outrebounded by UCLA in Kansas could beat UCLA if Joshua Smith is in the game for twenty-five minutes. I agree with Greg Anthony on Saturday saying with Joshua Smith playing normal minutes, UCLA’s frontcourt is as good as any in the country.

The only thing that matters is that they are getting better. All good programs get better as the season progresses but that improvement was sorely lacking last season. Will all the issues facing last year's team, they simply couldn't take the pressure anymore and just tanked. Not this year, this year's team has moxie and has improving by leaps and bounds right before our eyes. That's all I care about right now.

Next season if nobody leaves, this team is going to be a real force.