Back and Forth Q&A W/ Houston Chronicle beat writer Sam Khan Jr.
Great idea from fantastic Houston beat writer Sam Khan Jr. of the Houston Chronicle - he sent me five questions about UCLA, I sent him five about Houston, and we traded answers. Here were my questions for him, with his answers, and after the jump, his questions for me, with my answers...
1. How has Case Keenum looked in fall camp in terms of mobility and confidence? That is to say, is he running tentatively or with freedom? Same with his passing? Is he slinging it around like he was pre-injury?
Keenum has looked good. So far, he doesn't seem to be showing any ill effects. During their first live scrimmage of fall camp, the first pass he threw was a 65-yard touchdown to Patrick Edwards so, needless to say, folks were excited to see that. I don't really see any tentativeness with his running or his passing and he was able to operate the offense at a pretty good tempo during their scrimmages. I think you'll see as close to a pre-injury Keenum as you can get on Saturday.
2. What exactly happened to the Houston offense early against the Bruins last year, as when Keenum went down they were already trailing 21-3?
Plainly put, they were getting beat physically. UCLA's defensive front won the battle at the line of scrimmage which is why UH had trouble getting a running game going and was forced into a lot of third-and-longs. The receivers had trouble getting open with frequency, making matters worse. The coaches have said that this year's offensive line is as big as it has been in years, so perhaps that will make a difference. But they simply got beat by a team that was bigger, stronger and in some spots, faster than they were.
3. Johnathan Franklin and Co. ran all over the Cougars last year, to the tune of 266 yards, a breakout performance for the Pistol offense. Should we expect more of the same?
I would expect UCLA to still have success running the ball, but I don't know that I'd expect that kind of performance again. For one, the Cougars have upgraded their talent, size and depth on the defensive line and their linebacker depth is solid. Plus, they're now in the second year of the 3-4 scheme under defensive coordinator Brian Stewart, so guys are no longer thinking about where they need to be and what they need to do, they just know and are able to play faster. In addition to that, the two new coaches on defense --- defensive line coach Carlton Hall and linebackers coach Jamie Bryant --- have brought a new attitude to their position groups. UCLA's offensive line is so large that it's hard for me to think that the Bruins won't be able to open some lanes, but I'd expect a better performance from the Cougars this time around.
4. How much of a difference will the game location play? What should we realistically expect from the weather?
The Cougars being home at Robertson Stadium will be a big deal for them. They play well at home (26-5 at Robertson dating back to 2006) and even when they've struggled out of the gate against some teams, they've shown a penchant for late rallies in front of the home fans. Plus, the home crowd is going to be fired up for this one because Los Angeles is where it all went off track for the Cougars last year and it's the only BCS-conference opponent on UH's schedule. So the fans are putting a lot of stock in this one and I'd expect UH to feed off of their energy. If the weather cooperates, it should be a packed house. As for the weather, there's a chance of rain and cloudy conditions this weekend, so it could knock the temperature below triple digits (which would be ironic since it's been over 100 almost the entire summer). As of Friday afternoon, the forecast called for partly cloudy conditions with the highs around 100 and a 20 percent chance of rain. So if that holds, it'll still be steamy, but perhaps not 105-degrees-unbearable, like it has been for much of fall practice.
5. Houston is favored despite losing by 18 last year. Are you surprised by that? How has the tone of the team been in that regard?
Am I surprised? Yes and no. Yes in that UCLA handled UH pretty well last season, but no in the fact that the return of Case Keenum is a big deal in the eyes of those around the nation who maybe don't follow the Cougars as closely. Because of what he's accomplished, throwing for more than 5,000 yards in his sophomore and junior seasons, the preseason Heisman talk last year and his leading UH to wins against nationally-ranked teams, his presence lends a bit of national credibility to the Cougars. I don't know that it's worth 18 points, but if you factor in the return of running back Charles Sims (who wasn't suited up for UH last season) and being at home, that gives them a boost in the eyes of many. The tone of the team has been one of confidence, but I don't think they feel like the favorite necessarily. The Cougars feel UCLA is a quality team and they're hungry to get another chance against them.
6. Gun pointed to your head, someone's about to pull the trigger, life or death, man, life or death: What's the best BBQ in Houston? Best steakhouse? Clearly I'm already hungry.
Jon, I have immediately grown an even greater respect for you because you asked this question, because it's something every traveling beat writer should know. I think I might steal it for my Q&A next week when the Cougars have their first road game.
But to answer your question, the best BBQ in Houston for my money is Gatlin's. It's a tiny place on 19th street near TC Jester, northwest of downtown. It's a little out of the way if you're going to be around UH, but the brisket is moist, the ribs fall off the bone and the sauce has a little kick, which I like. They're very hospitable there and will treat you right. Because it's small and lots of folks go, you might have to wait a little bit for your food. In my opinion, it's very much worth the wait.
As for steakhouses, I love Taste of Texas on the west side of town. You get to choose your own steak, it's good quality, a nice setting, a large seating area and the salad bar is probably the best I've ever had when it comes to fresh ingredients and variety of choices. Again, a place you might have to wait for a little bit but very much worth it. I've never left that place less than stuffed.
1. What kind of effect do you think coach Rick Neuheisel's decision to play both Kevin Prince and Richard Brehaut will have on the Bruins' offensive attack on Saturday? And what do you think of the decision and handling of the quarterback situation to this point?
Neuheisel has said he's waiting for one quarterback to distance himself, but I have to think that if he actually started the "competition" out at 50-50 to start, he'd have his guy. Instead, after saying it was a coin-flip heading into fall camp, Prince got 90 percent of the first-team reps in the first two weeks of camp and struggled while Brehaut looked increasingly impressive with the twos.
Then as Brehaut started getting more and more first-team reps, Prince was more accurate and decisive with his throws, perhaps tipping the balance once more. So now we're at a point where they both look pretty similar, with the standard strengths - Prince with the run, Brehaut with the pass - and improvement in the weaknesses. So...50/50.
If Neuheisel actually goes through with that idea, though, I'd be shocked. If it's a seven-point game either way, is he really going to take a chance and put Brehaut in? What if it's still a seven-point game in the third quarter? I think Prince is the starter but he wants to give Brehaut a few looks. Not exactly a two-QB system to me.
2. What kind of impact will the addition of the new coaches on the offensive staff, Mike Johnson and Jim Mastro, have on the Bruins offense? And how much pistol do you think should UH expect to see on Saturday?
The offense has looked much sharper and crisper with the two of them running the show, and a big part of that has to do with knowing the finer details better under Mastro. As great an offensive mind as Norm Chow is, you can't expect him to understand the nuiances of an
offense he knows little about. Mastro might be the No. 2 Pistol expert out there, to Nevada HC Chris Ault. Johnson, meanwhile, has added a swagger and relatability aspect to the offense, as he is an excellent communicator. I expect to see a lot of Pistol in Week 1, and a commitment to the run.
3. Will the Bruins be better against the run this season than they were last year (108th nationally), and if so, how big an improvement do you expect?
UCLA had a penchant for giving up huge gains on the ground last year, and that has been addressed extensively in spring and fall camps. Stud linebacker Akeem Ayers was fantastic at times but could find himself out of position with his overaggressiveness, and the goal isn't to necessarily replace his massive stat line, but count down on the number of times the gap is open. The Bruins return nine of 11 starters - also gone is fellow second-rounder safety Rahim Moore - and they've looked good against the run in camp. I see an improvement, but not into the nation's top tier.
4. How much will an experienced secondary help UCLA's efforts against UH's passing attack, which returns a healthy Case Keenum and a pair of talented receivers in Patrick Edwards and Tyron Carrier?
Keenum and Co. were getting torched by the Bruins last year when he went down, so it's hard to gauge what we're going to see Saturday. I expect it to be a pretty sound back-and-forth battle, but UCLA will turn up the pressure and not let Keenum pick them apart short. If the Bruins can get their hands on a couple balls, they'll be happy.
5. Will the kicking situation be a concern for UCLA on Saturday?
Yes. It's a calamity for a team that has been lights out in the kicking game for years. Kip Smith was just named starter, but his leash is shorter than a hungry rottweiler's.
6. How hot is the hot seat for Neuheisel and how critical is winning the season opener in that respect?
(Shameless plug alert) I wrote about that in my season preview that came out Thursday, but I'll give you the Cliff Notes here: I don't believe Neuheisel is on a true hot seat, in that there is a particular number of wins he needs or accomplishments he meets. UCLA's administration loves their Golden Boy, their smiling, gunslinging Rose Bowl-winning walk-on quarterback, and they want to see him succeed. Problem is, their definition of success doesn't exactly mesh with the fan base, which is starving to get back on the national scene. AD Dan Guerrero is a patient man who talks in measured terms about Neuheisel's future, and I have to believe that a .500 season with a bowl berth would keep Neuheisel at his alma mater.
The Bruins were bombarded by injuries last season and things fell apart pretty quickly, but three straight highly regarded recruiting classes has the depth at its best in Neuheisel's tenure, and the schedule is favorable. A win at Houston would give the team the confidence in itself to carry over into a walloping of San Jose State, and then Texas looms large in Week 3. If UCLA gets the ball rolling, it could be a snowball effect and Neuheisel could find his
seat cooling off by the game.



Super awesome post!! Please do this every week!
Great post Jon. Seriously try and do it every week.
You really hit the nail on the head with this one jon, great feature. I'd love to see this continue with opposing beat writers each week.
Clearly this writer can't be trusted for good information...........Hickory Hollow in the Heights is the best BBQ in Houston! Gatlin's is very good but "the Hollow" beats it........trust me Jon, give it a try.
I was just in Houston last summer. Whatever you do, stay away from Good's (sp?). The BBQ is decent, but it's completely touristy and you can do much better in Houston.
And agreed with everyone else - Jon, please continue doing these for every game you can!
Yes, I agree, please do this again!
It is refreshing to hear the opposing team's viewpoint on a game, instead of hearing vanilla bruins talk about how great their baby blue and yellow team is. (Not that that is bad, mind you)
GREAT FEATURE!!!!
However, I think you missed BIG by not asking the obvious. Which is, asking about Houston and their vow to load the box and beg UCLA to throw. How accurate and serious does he see this? What has he heard? And will they then refrain from a 3-4 to load the box?
It would appear that Houston's AD is dumber than Rick Perry to schedule an early September game for an early afternoon kickoff. Nobody's gonna show up. And if they do, they will be too hot to make any noise. Bruins roll.
Notice that everybody talks about Keenum being back, despite the fact that Houston was getting blown out when he went down. But nobody mentions that Prince is back, who beat TWO Texas teams with his legs, brains and guts last year. Go Bruins.
Encore, Encore
Jon, thanks for all your committment and hard work ! we really appreciate your effort!
Go Bruins!
Jon, strong work as all ways.
I've lived in Houston for 7 years and Texas most of my life and I find Goode Company to be excellent BBQ, rudy's is good too, granted I haven't been to the place Sam mentions. Taste of Texas is good and so is Pappas Brothers steakhouse, avoid saltgrass steakhouse though. Right by campus is frenchy's chicken which is great too. We also have our version of rosco's chicken and waffles in the breakfast klub, the waffles aren't as good but the chicken's better!
Eric,
You've got to try Hickory Hollow if you've never been.........I promise you'll thank me :-)
Really enjoyed this, Jon ...
And i always love the food comments. Don't get to travel outta the Rockies these days much, but it's great to hear about the local culture -- nothing highlights that like food & spirits -- whenever you do.
I agree... very nice feature. If you can find a willing journalist/blogger for each game, it would make a nice read every week. I also enjoyed the "Think/Know" segment during Fall camp. Maybe you could sneak that segment in again at the season midpoint or before a "big game" (Texas, pac12 opener, $C game)?
Nice work Jon!
GO BRUINS!
Great interview!! Great concept, well done!
very well done. good read.
Umm, you smell Jon.
(Not that I think you do, but it's been far too long since someone said something negative about you and it's wigging me out...)
Ummmmmm....anyone else notice that this guy is a MAJOR homer??? The tone of Jon's responses is far more unbiased than his. I think we need to take his answers with a grain of salt!!!
Well done Jon, I'd like to see this done every week!