Q: You have been around more UCLA football over the past year than any of us. Has your perception or expectations for the team changed after watching the first two games, or are you not surprised by their performance?
A: Before the season started, I thought that the hype had gotten a little out of control. Sure it had talent, but I figured UCLA to be more of a top-15 team until it proved otherwise — most likely on the outside looking in once the College Football Playoff rolled around. But I certainly didn’t expect the Bruins to look as inconsistent as they have through two games.
I still think there’s plenty of time for the Bruins to find their groove (on both sides of the ball) and win the Pac-12 South. As for knocking off Oregon (presumably the Pac-12 North champ) for the outright conference title — that looks real tough right now.
Q: I know Virginia and Memphis aren’t top-25 caliber teams, but am I dumb for thinking that they appeared to at least be .500 teams this year?
A: No, I think that could be the ceiling for both those teams, and they’ll be helped by playing in the ACC and the AAC, respectively. But they could also end up at three wins each. It’s just difficult to say given the small sample size at this point. Continue reading