Answer Wednesday! (Part 2)

Some more answers to reader questions.

Q: Edward said:
Do you receive extra compensation for participating on this blog, and do you have free reign on what you post?

A: No, I do not. I do have a lot of freedom on this blog, which is a wonderful aspect of it and one reason I enjoy it so much.

Q: mownyc said:
Are the recent “soft verbals” from 4 recruits a sign that USC has it’s sights and possibly silent commitments from better players?

A: Yes. There is a delicate dance for USC right now with 15 February scholarships and trying to squeeze the most out of it. So even if someone commits now, there might be a change by signing date.

  • steve49

    I saw a list of the offers USC has made, and what I don’t understand is if someone accepts and commits, is it binding on the school to give the scholy?

  • Globe

    Wolfie has free reign to post whatever negative crap he can come up with.

  • dtksr1

    No matter who wants in, there better be Turek-McCarthy type bodies in that bunch if you are going to play small LBs & RBs behind the D & O lines or they will get beaten up!

  • The Monopoly Is Over Here

    Wolf writes this blog for lap dances from Charlize

  • NJ Trojan

    @steve49: No. The commitment is not binding until a valid Letter of Intent is fully executed.

  • uscunderground

    who cares about your answers. You and Petros better stop writing and talking negative garbae about USC and Barkley.