• Spedjones

    I will post with some thought here Mama is the answer. SC’s always had the flash (Lee, Woods etc.), but they’ve fallen off as their line has thinned. Jackson is the best athlete by far, but SC needs to beef up if it wants to compete with UCLA.

    • L’Angelo Misterioso

      Compete with ucla ? Really ? You have ONE season that was better than average, which in uclaville means it was outstanding, and SC now has to compete with ucla?

      • Spedjones

        That’s right, @ssclown. Was talking about UCLA’s OL recruiting tho. Look at last year’s class and see the future of our rivalry.

        • Trojan Hoarse

          I know it’s cliche, but games are won and lost in the trenches….just ask the SEC…….

    • B.Miller

      When USC’s goal in football is to compete with UCLA, then the mighty have fallen.. The NCAA has allowed you to enjoy a year or maybe even two.. But everyone knows that UCLA is little (retarded) brother.. Its cute competition, but not worth getting excited over..
      All UCLA fans.. WIN SOMETHING FIRST! A Pac 12 title, a BCS Bowl.. and we might enjoy the competition a little more..

      FACTS!

      • Spedjones

        yes, it’s been a long stretch for UCLA indeed. But go back to the 90s to see that down times don’t just happen to the Bruins. The idea that SC will always be the SC it was under Pete is already way off base, and Lane’s impact really hasn’t even been felt yet. Argue with me if you’d like, but we both know where the programs are heading.

        • B.Miller

          there is nothing to argue.. you haven’t made a valid point yet..
          WIN SOMETHING! and we can have a real discussion or argument. until then why waste either of our time with your petty cheap shots..
          speak facts!