USC Ranked 39th In The World

Here’s a list that is not related to football. USC is ranked the 39th-best university in the world according to the Center For World University Rankings. But will these rankings be used to pick the next national champion?

25 thoughts on “USC Ranked 39th In The World”

number 16 on the Earth, UCLA is!

but number ONE in the Universe, they are!

the Force is strong with the Bruins, i sense.

much fear i sense in the torgans!

fear leads to anger.

anger leads to hate.

hate leads to suuuuffering.

I believe it was BruinRob who loved to trumpet these rankings on this blog. It is a weird list. UC Berkeley ahead of Yale, Princeton, and the University of Chicago? UC San Diego ahead of Duke?! Illinois ahead of Northwestern? Arizona State ahead of Brown? UC Irvine way, way ahead of Rice? If only USC had applied for more patents!

marvgoux1 on July 17, 2013 at 5:46 pm said:

USF ahead of USC told me it was a joke.
- ThaiMex on July 17, 2013 at 6:57 pm said:
  
  We get it guys….the ONLY LIST that makes any sense, is the ONE that has SUCks at the top.
  
  BTW. Cal, UCLA, UCSD, UCSF, and UCSB are all ranked ahead of YOU BONEHEADS. SOME private schools are over rated!
  fit UN torgans!
  - Joe Blow on July 17, 2013 at 7:27 pm said:
    
    #1 was Mrs. Bucket….on the PIG list.
    - TrojanFan on July 18, 2013 at 3:11 pm said:
      
      I saw that list, bucket sure was proud!!!
    - Joe Blow on July 18, 2013 at 5:01 pm said:
      
      You would be too if you had that FAT of a pig in bed every night! Oink! Oink! Oink!

Congrats trogies – you’re still above Colorado!

Any poll that as ASU above rice and dartmouth should not be taken seriously.

If you don’t like this list, look at USNews. USC has come a long way since I was a little boy in Los Angeles, and all of you who are alumni should feel very good about it. UCLA is a very good university as well.

It’s good for the graduates and students, it’s good for the city.

As to Scott’s last question, how many of you wish that you had instead attended Alabama? That says it all.

gotroy22 on July 18, 2013 at 6:13 am said:

When was SC a “little boy”? We were a university for 50 years before they built Royce Hall!
- ThaiMex on July 18, 2013 at 8:00 am said:
  
  50 year head start?…..How come you TRAIL in TOTAL NATIONAL TITLES?
  fit UN torgans!
  - TrojanFan on July 18, 2013 at 9:39 am said:
    
    Interesting, USC men are up 20 plus on the ruin boys
    
    Compare apples to apples, eliminate the softball titles and you’re in third place…hahaha!!!
    
    PS….The NCAA was founded in 1906…..nice try you piece of shlt!!!
    
    OWNED!!!!!
    - Joe Blow on July 18, 2013 at 12:42 pm said:
      
      Glad you’re back. Most of the quacks are Fucla pukes.
      
      Hey ThaiBean…1954
    - B.Miller on July 18, 2013 at 12:43 pm said:
      
      FACTS!
- Spedjones on July 18, 2013 at 9:20 am said:
  
  academically, SC’s been a little boy for all but about the last 10 years. Anyone who applied to SC before the early 2000’s was basically accepted sight unseen. Everybody knows this.
  - Joe Blow on July 18, 2013 at 12:43 pm said:
    
    Too bad your daddy didn’t have any money. GED? AA? Or are you just plain S T U P I D ?
    - TrojanFan on July 18, 2013 at 3:06 pm said:
      
      He checked “all of the above”….LOL!!!
- Ben Factor on July 20, 2013 at 6:03 pm said:
  
  I was a little boy growing up in L.A., and if USC was the #24 university in the country, it was not publicized. The image for me was “party school for rich kids”, with some good sports teams.
  
  And UCLA didn’t have a big rep either. Any high school grad with a B average could attend there.
  
  Cal had the big rep, despite being open to the same B students.
  
  Maybe I was just misinformed.