UCLA 107, USC 73 (Final Score)

Looks like the Bruins wanted Andy Enfield to regret saying “if you want to play slow go to UCLA.”

68 thoughts on “UCLA 107, USC 73 (Final Score)

        • No …still are … like UCLA and basketball… wait… you turned down Kansas coach who wanted the job…. apperently your own AD doesn’t want a crown jewel for UCLA… just a piece of tin.

          • Keep reading that SC will “be back to where it was before sanctions” in a few years…Troxans overlooking the 90s all together and assume Sarknado = Pete. Crazy.

          • I’m sorry after the 90’s we did what again ??? oh yeah … so easy to get your goat little guttie… throw a little FACTS , and you loser lose it… LMAO!!!

      • Oh that’s right the melt down in El Paso and the Purple Magic Cleaner Bowl that puts University of Second Choice in 2nd in “bowl” wins.. .Sarknado you sly dog you, how did you end up with this gig???

        • Congrats you have the toilet bowl over us… fits perfect with your toilet program…. I’ll take our 24 Rose Bowls over a Sun Bowl… but than again you guys go to Rose Bowls to Lose…don’t you? LULZ…. Now say something meaningless in your Westwood Jiber-jaber…

      • 9 NCs and 6 Heisman, and nothing of relevance for more than 30 years other than cheating. You’re most known for cheating! LOL

        Hilarious that such a self described powerhouse in football couldn’t even win one BCS title during the BCS era!

  1. The best part of this game will be the presser after!!! Watching Enfield eat s&@$ after all his smack talk!!

    He sat there during the game with his head down like a whipped dog!!!

  2. A great week for UCLA: First, Mora spurns the Texas overture, then Hundley announces he’s coming back, and now the spanking of the little Trojans by the mighty Bruins. “Just like Football!” indeed…

    • Mora would never go to Texas. He would face expectations there. Why not stay in California where the girls are pretty, the weather is nice, and you aren’t expected to win (it’s just a bonus)?

      Apparently, Woulard isn’t all you guys thought he was if you are stoked for Hundley. I thought your trolls were telling me he was bigger, better, stronger. Will Hundley be scared for his job? Lulz.

      • Oh, don’t worry. I’m pretty sure the nation’s Heisman frontrunner is going to keep his starting job. 2015 is when you will get the pleasure of watching Woulard run all over 7-Win Sarkiffian and the Trojans in the Mausoleum.

          • Didn’t you say that after FADE McCow ??? Good O’le Parade ALL america Cory- Paus ??? Sure was years to come … FOR USC FOOTBALL !!! THREE HEISMANS … TWO NC… and how many consecutive conference champ… come on ….say it with me … come on little guttie ..1,2,3,4,5,6,… 7 … 7!!!!

          • 50 what? 2-0 is all I remember. Good luck this November when Hundley picks your depleted D apart for win number 3.

          • Ha! Knew it. You must still be in school. So many losses in your future Jr. You’ll see.

          • Wait a minute…your facts are wrong. USC didn’t win any NC’s during the BCS era, and one of the heisman’s you had to give back.

            I’ll give it to you, congrats on winning one Heisman trophy. USC hasn’t won a NC since 1978. Way to live in the past!

          • LOL that you don’t know that. I’ll tell you what: if Hundley isn’t picked pre-season as a consensus Top 5 Heisman candidate, I’ll change my handle.

          • See, now you are changing it up. You clearly said he was the frontrunner. Mariota is the frontrunner, at this point.

            Now, you just want him on the list. Come on.

          • “Change it up” is correct: we are discussing a Heisman candidate and it’s a UCLA player. Don’t worry, though, I’m sure SC will produce one again in the next ten or 15 years.

          • I actually hear Kessler is a dark horse for the trophy –> things nobody is saying, ever.

      • WOW….grasping for ANYTHING, are you? I sort of figured that with all the BANAL posting you do (DOZENS EVERY DAY)..it would eventually come to this.
        Watch out T-Fail….you now have competition!
        fit UN!

    • LOL! But WAIT: Dorrell was 35-27 at UCLA, while Sark was 35-29 at UW. Dorrell > Sarkiffian.

Comments are closed.