USC Morning Buzz: No Offer For Eighth Grader Yet

USC has reportedly offered a scholarship to cornerback-wide receiver Brendan Radley-Hiles. This is news because Radley-Hiles is currently an 8th grader. But he’s a rising 8th grader (just kidding). His brother is Utah tailback Lucky Radley. Which reminds me, does Lane Kiffin’s offer to Upland ninth grader Nathan Tilford still stand under Steve Sarkisian?

UPDATED: The story is too good to be true because USC has not offered Radley-Hiles a scholarship despite the youngster’s comments to Scout.com. So he will have to wait like most kids for that offer.

29 thoughts on “USC Morning Buzz: No Offer For Eighth Grader Yet

    • Bookie is not 16 he is 14 years old doesn’t turn 15 till August so get your facts straight

  1. he may be rising, but Kiff, i mean Sark is sinking…..to a new low!!

    more of the same shenanigans!!

    why do you Dummies keep hiring from the Caesar tree and acting surprised when you get burned??

    HAWR-HAWR!!!

    5-1 he ends up NOT going to Southern Cal!!

    • 5-1 he ends up not going to USC? Wow, unless that’s the Kentucky Derby, those are terrible odds. It seems you understand odds as well as you do SC football.

      • 5 to 1 against him coming to Southern Cal…..what’s so hard to understand? find a smart dummy to explain it to you.

        (Dummies…sigh)

        • 5-1 are terrible odds on something like that. 1-1 means if you bet 2 you win 2. You are saying if you bet 10 bucks on him not coming, you would get 50 if he doesn’t. The only reason someone gives you those odds is if they are reasonably sure it won’t happen. You cant even get even odds on your prediction? That’s a terrible prediction.
          I find it ironic you call someone dummy considering how little you know about the topics on which you post.

          • ok so we all know you’re a degenerate gambler….i am not a bookie so these “odds” are not a real, dumbbell. he’s not coming. that’s all you need to know. i can’t take time out to explain the wit and wisdom of each of my gems to Dummies!!

            here’s another sure bet: you’ll continue to respond in defense of your degenerate gambling habit!!

          • I’ll translate from troll to English

            “You’ve proven I don’t know what I’m talking about so I’ll attack you instead.”

            You don’t have to know gambling to know that. Day 1 of any stats class would teach that to you. Most high schoolers can handle this material.

          • I think it’s fair to say TF you haven’t much to do all day except pedantically argue useless minutiae.

          • Oh sorry, I missed that. I was too busy wading through your hundreds of posts on practice TDs and Rutgers’s commencement speaker.

          • Thanks for reading my comments TF. Your comments are rarely worth the reading effort.

          • I see bucket’s butt buddy has come to defend his (her? its?) honor.

    • Same shenanigans except of course there was no offer.

      Wolf is making up stories.

      Same shenanigans indeed

    • I agree…… and who was the lead recruiter?…. Tee Martin?…..

    • There was no offer. Once again Wolf demonstrates his crack journalism skills.

      • Agree…why is the source not attributed if the blogger isn’t saying that he is reporting x, y or z ??

  2. Now Scottie is BLAMING the KID for his erroneous report…. you’re pathetic, Wolf

  3. Scottie is saddened that this rumor was “too good to be true” so he can not make childish comments degrading the kid for the next four years ala David Sills.

  4. Scotty again using the internet to do his reporting. Scotty is to reporting what Lane Kiffin is to coaching. Without the money, successful dad and hot wife.

    • Is there any chance that someone can pull him off the bus at LAX?….

  5. You only put this report on your blog because you wanted to mention LAME KIFFIN

  6. Wow more negative comments about Scout from an UCLA “fan”. Hey it was a joke! Come on Bruins lighten up when you visit here!

  7. Hi, Smeagol.

    Just a note that comments with links in them often wind up in an “unapproved” status by default in order to assure that it goes into our moderation queue. It’s a mechanism designed to prevent spam from littering our comment sections.

    Thanks for reading.

    Gina Dvorak
    Emerging Platforms Director | managing mobile, social media & data projects for the Los Angeles News Group

Comments are closed.