13 thoughts on “USC Quarterback Question

      • That’s because it’s blog, Golly-Nerd. If you weren’t so obsessed with Star Wars you would know that.

  1. AGAIN. Ohio St. needed three QBs to play well to win the national title. The first and second string QBs got hurt. All three had to play at a high level. Was it luck or great recruiting depth?

    • You performance at the Emerald City Comic Con Best Wookie Costume contest was brilliant, Golly-Nerd. But a Participant ribbon is not the same as a first place medal.

  2. Well,it isn’t wrong,just not the best use of allowed scholarships,particularly the way their linemen are ALWAYS injured…I am not convinced you need 5 q/b’s…3 maybe 4…that is it.

  3. What a waste of a scholarship. We are neck deep in QB’s right now and will have at least 4 in 2016. How about some more linemen, or seems we are not to deep at RB either. Wait to see what comes up in 2017, offer a smart one and get him enrolled early.

  4. USC can sign as many Quarterback as they want, but eventually the 4 and 5 star recruit will start going else where once they realize there is a 3 year wait, for their opportunity.Your average QB won’t mind sitting on the bench for that period of time, but not the all star.This is the era of players wanting to start now, and if USC does not give them the chance to do so, Stanford, Cal, and perhaps Washington, will.

Comments are closed.