35 thoughts on “USC Question Of The Night

  1. The Rah-Rahs can’t believe SUCC wins only 8 games with a 10 game cupcake schedule.

      • and a night krap……..although OLAF tends to dry dock HIS kraps……..ticks off his wife to no end…

        • Very clever from a Klownster whose name is Krap. The hook is baited Krapola, you may start lunging.

    • UCLA can’t spell 11 wins…nor can they spell Rose Bowl Victory.

  2. GEEZ LOUISE, wolfman!!! are you deliberately TRYING to give the Dummies a heart attack????

    their eggshell-thin psyches are already at the breaking point with the devastating news about the Gauntlet, and now you lay THIS on them???

    #ElLoboMasRuthless

  3. They’ll easily top that. The bookmakers have been used to the mediocre (8/9 win) Trojans over the last few years with so few players. The real Trojans will be making an appearance this fall. Think 10 wins…. Good starting point for the new era.

    • Concur with you LR, 8 is the minimum, figure 50-50 on the other 4 games, over/under 10.

  4. Logical? ….that’s what makes sports so entertaining. .. it’s not always logical. …

  5. Another stupid Wolfie poll that only a Troll would love.

    Here’s a better poll. Do you think ucla’s little gutties will win 11 games this football season for the first time in its entire history? Any takers?

      • Haha…No 11 win season EVER…Hawr-Hawr. What a crotch kick to the trolls. No Rose Bowl victories in the last 30 years too. OUCH!! OWNED!!

        • Yes, but they’ve won three in a row against their sanction depleted, crosstown rivals!

          • Excuses, excuses, excuses. What’s new over at Klown U. The adage cheaters never prosper seems appropriate for SUCCdumb.

          • So USC WASN’T depleted by excessive sanctions??…. it was all just a DREAM????… Thank you for clearing that up for us, OLAF!……

          • I’m stocked. Krapola jumped on the bait. Some things never change.

            Never said SUCC didn’t; just that SUCC got what it deserved for cheating. Is that so hard for you to understand.

            Of course Kraps, to you, Klown U was framed and railroaded by the NCAA; I mean just because SUCC used an ineligible Reggie “I got the money” Bush in a BCS victory shouldn’t justify forfeiting the game.

            SUCC is above the rules, right Krapola? SUCC don’t need follow no rules, that’s for losers. The hook is baited, bite it Kraps.

          • There’s no argument from me, OLAF, that your ARE the biggest masterbaiter on this blog…..

          • The Zingmeister. Stale, very stale Krapola, but have a Cigar anyway, It sounds like you need something to SUCC. The hook is baited Kraps.

          • Lo, I hope they put those 3 wins in a time capsule and pull it out when they are getting crushed 50-0 again. It’s going to be a nice little run for the Trojans.

          • The one the onlyGoober. Klown U bends over for UCLA 38 – 20.

            Because you were just hatched, you don’t remember the Kiffy Goat announcing Sanctions wouldn’t bother mighty Klown U.

            And yet the Klowsters continually whine and blame stunning SUCC losses on the sanctions. Boston College on.

            Hey Goober what’s the reason for the SUCC men’s Basketball team success?

          • Blame?…I think those sanctions are called facts.

            Who did UCLA blame for the loss to Stanford? The only chance for some REAL success and UCLA folds like the little bears that couldn’t. I’d be mad too. Mora to Jacksonville, enjoy those 3 AMAZING WINS OVER USC DURING THEIR SANCTIONS.

          • OLAF is delusional………but he simply enjoys all of the attention that he receives by posting mindless, inflammatory bull$hit, solely intended to provoke a response….”bait”, as he likes to call it…..

          • I bait, you jump Krapola. I guess it’s something you adopted from your football reference bible ” North Dallas Forty.”

          • When will Golly_Nerd get a one game winning streak going at the Best Wookie Contest at the Comic Con conventions?

          • And you actually BELIEVE everything that the media writes???…okay… this explains EVERYTHING…..if you can understand the basics of managing a full roster and the importance of depth, then you’re as shallow as Scott and the rest of the trolls…

    • Mr Jack B:
      I think what your missing here is that we had a world class basketball program when I was the coach.
      JW

      • Johnny, remember SUCC is only world class in educating Mainland Chinese students on how to rip off American Technology. Keep up the good work Klownsters.

  6. I presume this is before a bowl game, which means SC would go
    8-4.

    If that is Sark’s 2015 record the Trojan alums will have him tarred, feathered and thrown into a tub of boiling oil.

    Metaphorically speaking, naturally.

  7. When you recruit all the talent in the world, 8 wins is unacceptable for a power house like USC. And I don’t want to hear any nonsense about how young the team is, or depth issues. The big problem here is, the athletic administration hired a questionable coach, so I’m going to wait until after next season before I make any evaluations with the program. Because the only thing Steve Sarkisian has proven is that he’s a great recruiter, but then again, SC is one of those Schools that can pretty much recruit itself.

    • He has a lot to prove. 9 wins his first season is better than most if not all those that preceded him. USC is a great place to recuit for, it doesn’t recruit itself. He should recruit top 10 classes yearly, anything less wouldn’t be good enought. He hasn’t done anything? Washington won 0 the year before here started. He turned that program around and left the cupboard well stocked, 3 1st round picks last draft. We’ll see how he does, it’s too early to claim anything more then optimism.

  8. Take the under, especially with powerhouses Arkansas St and Idaho on the schedule!

Comments are closed.