Steve Sarkisian Talked To Max Nikias

Steve Sarkisian said he met with USC president Max Nikias and “it went great.”

33 thoughts on “Steve Sarkisian Talked To Max Nikias

  1. Too bad for Wolfie. You just lost one of your anti-Sark tools from your toolbox.

    Sark has the complete support of USC as well as his players.

    You’ll have to come up with another Troll angle, quick.

      • Don’t you love it when Jackie Girl the brony pretends he speaks for the university? In his My Little Pony world he is significant.

          • No, you’re fan willing to accept mediocre coaches, an AD who didn’t vet the current substance abuser and probably repeat the ” I trust the coaches ” mantra. Rah, rah, rah

          • So sorry USC makes you so unhappy. It’s just a shame that your season is destined for crap. Maybe a shrink can help you? Prayer? Diet change? Hypnosis? Better hunker down. It’s gonna be another long, long season poor baby.

          • Rah rahs just like going to the games and shaking their cardinal and gold pom poms. Real SC fans expect the team to be building towards national championships. You sir, are a rah rah.

  2. Stick a fork in this conversation…..shocked that there is also an o-line story on Scottie’s blog this day

  3. It went great? Did Sark get a pat on the back? Where is MG at a time like this man? As I read Scott Wolf’s posting of what Sark said and I read between the lines and there was nothing but a lot of envy… they wish they all were Trojans!

  4. The issues here arent about football. We either support USC or another team. The concern is for Coach’s health and the culture of the atletic dept and the crossover into fundraising at USC. The team will not reach its full potential without an ethical environment and then EVERYONE rooting for USC will be unhappy. Sweeping this under the rug and whistling through the graveyard is poor policy. Pat Haden sanctioned himself 2 games for his rant. ONeill got 1 game for being drunk at a bar on his private time. Is the message to the team its OK to act poorly and perform up and downs? I doubt this is good precedent for the season. Why is it the major news oulets are taking it seriously? Simple because they should. We could have handled this good from the start but even if we come out on top we’re gonna be labeled as “win at all costs.” Not good in the long run.

    • (YAWN) You have lost all credibility here, feller. You thought there was still a BCS Championship! You need to go find another forum, perhaps about tools – and if there is not one about tools, you and gotroy22 can start one!

      • You never had any credibility here, Rah Rah 4 SC. Please go to wearesc wher you can shake your pom pom all day long.

      • Yolo, socal na(rra)tive et. al… its great to know you all read my posts. I did call the CFP the BCS playoff in earlier posts. A big deal it seems to those who can’t form a logical reply on the merits and need to use pejoratives and baseless personal attacks to feel good about themselves on a computer screen. USC has been spending the better part of the last 40 years becoming a LEADING institution. Today it seems that it is addicted to fundraising at any cost. I may disagree with much of its pursuits in its School of LAS but thst is part of a University. However when they are willing to risk the well being of its employees and students from fesr of its effect on athletic and other program fundraising, it sends a horribly bad message and puts the institution way behind the progress its made. The ‘SC’ fans on this site who objectify winning at all costs are no better than the trolls they put down. We are more than Saturday night football games and should act like it.

  5. Wolfbag’s shining moment, “did you talk to Max?” What a hard hitting reporter. Sark’s response, “Yes”. Riviting! And scooter goes for the fences, “How did it go?”. Man I was on the edge of my seat. Finally Sark responds, “Great”. WOW, Wolfbag, I think that Pulitzer is in the bag!

Comments are closed.