First Heisman Trophy Odds

USC QB Sam Darnold is fourth in the first Heisman Trophy odds for 2017 by Bovada at 9/1. Oklahoma QB Baker Mayfield is No. 1 at 11/2. Full odds after the jump:

Odds to Win the 2017 Heisman Trophy

Baker Mayfield (QB Oklahoma)                          11/2

JT Barrett (QB Ohio State)                                 6/1

Lamar Jackson (QB Louisville)                           7/1

Sam Darnold (QB USC)                                     9/1

Saquon Barkley (RB Penn State)                        10/1

Jake Browning (QB Washington)                        10/1

Trace McSorley (QB Penn State)                        10/1

Deondre Francois (QB Florida State)                  12/1

Josh Rosen (QB UCLA)                                     12/1

Mason Rudolph (QB Oklahoma State)                12/1

Jalen Hurts (QB Alabama)                                  12/1

Derrius Grice (RB LSU)                                      15/1

Bo Scarbrough (RB Alabama)                            15/1

Nick Fitzgerald (QB Mississippi State)                22/1

Nick Chubb (RB Georgia)                                   25/1

Kamryn Pettway (RB Auburn)                             25/1

Shane Buechele (QB Texas)                               35/1

Luke Falk (QB Washington State)                       35/1

18 thoughts on “First Heisman Trophy Odds

  1. According to SW, Sam would be the #1 QB taken in this draft. Yet, Sam is behind 3 other QB’s, according to Las Vegas, for the 2017 Heisman. Which is it?

  2. I think those are the odds of Rosen finishing the season standing upright.
    #UCLA #poweroffense #4-8

  3. If Sam Darnold stays healthy, and USC wins the majority of their games, then I guarantee Darnold will win the Heisman .

  4. Bovada is obviously run by cartoonish, mentally deficient people. Neither Browning nor Rosen have any shot at the Heisman whatsoever. What a laugh.

    What are the odds stumbling, bumbling Willie Taggart (24-25 in four seasons) wins 2017 Coach of the Year? Ask Bovada and Birdcage for a unanimously stupid answer.

  5. I would switch Rosen and Faulk. More realistic. Who are the experts that come up with this garbage.

Comments are closed.