Conference Of Champions

Posted on by

4 thoughts on “Conference Of Champions”

  1. This is what I don’t understand, the NCAA Selection Committe will take a 18-14 team for the NCAA tournament. Yet, USC has a 24-9 record. If you just base it on wins, USC is in, but they base it on a buch of whooey where they compare one scheduel as being tough and the other as well. They don’t take into consideration on how tough the league is that the team plays. The PAC 12 has Three teams that are in the top 10. If the 18-14 team played in the PAC 12, they would end up like Washington or Washington St., at the bottom. Yes, USC blew games but they showed enough in the PAC 12 tournament to the committee that they belong in the tournament. If not, let them play in ther NIT and take it all.

  2. I don’t get the PAC-12 network, but I’d much rather watch sports than the march of idiotic “bracketology” from “experts” who are jst guessing anyway.

    Proposal: every “expert” posts their bracket. Bottom 50% get fired and have to get a real job.

  3. Yep – but Providence won’t have the #4 pick like they had last year. Love the #11 slot.

Comments are closed.