Question Of The Day

One would hope that they realize that the move is out of necessity rather than intention. The fact is USC's top 2 backs are out (Reed and Washington). Any successful team needs to be at least 3 deep at the RB position. Pete is doing what needs to be done under the circumstances. It doesn't mean Bradford's move is permanent. I would prefer you ask Green or Tyler, get answers and post that rather than just post inflammatory/suggestive questions without answers but maybe that's just me.

You don't come to USC if you're worried about the depth chart.

Tyler get over it, its a legit question not inflammatory.

Wonder what it would be like to have a reporter report the news rather than try to fan the flames of controversy...

No Problem. Marc Tyler is not afraid of anything, BG either. If they were they'd consider that Stafon Johnson, and CJ Gable to be bigger threats. Why get all excited because Brandford is back there? If anything it gives them more incentive to get here, seeing that 'SC is hurting for backs to the extent to pull players off of the defense.

I would guess that Marc Tyler hadn't even heard about it until Jimmy Clausen's Dad, sporting a sardonic smile broke the news to Tyler. Then Jimmy gave Marc a hard time over dinner about the Trojans being 6 deep next season with 4 & 5 star upperclassmen TB's even before Marc hits the Trojan practice field.

Marc probably told Jimmy to shut his pie hole, then Jimmy flicked his green peas at Marc, and Marc retaliated by throwing a large spoonful of mashed potatoes at Jimmy -- but Jimmy ducked (he's kinda elusive ya know) and hilarious food fight hijinks ensued.

It probably ended with Jimmy's Mom blaming the whole episode on Allen Bradford. Jeez. Women.

What kind of questions is that?? If the coach needs help at a certain position he will move someone that can play it.

You're right Scott, I'm sure that Marc Tyler would want USC to be thin at RB. I'm sure that Marc would be thrilled to see that!!!

Calm down omg.

I never said it wasn't a legit question - because it is. What I said was that I'd rather Scott post an answer to said question after having spoken to either Tyler or Green rather than just posting an inflammatory question without any attempt at obtaining an answer as well. I just prefer my journalists to both provide great questions and obtain the answers to them. That's all.

I agree with Tyler here. That is speculative journalism at best and lazy at worst.

I suppose if Green or Tyler by some remote chance decommit you two will be the first to blame Scott Wolf.