About The Secondary
Even USC's cornerbacks conceded that in their defensive formation Saturday, it was possible to find the open areas.
``We played a lot of Cover 2, in cover 2, you can find a soft spot,'' cornerback Kevin Thomas said.
« Change Of Philosophy? | Main | Practice Recap »
Even USC's cornerbacks conceded that in their defensive formation Saturday, it was possible to find the open areas.
``We played a lot of Cover 2, in cover 2, you can find a soft spot,'' cornerback Kevin Thomas said.
Comments
damn you josh pinkard! where are you?????
Posted by: matthew | October 9, 2006 04:28 PM
So junk the cover-2! Is that really that hard to figure out? Right now our defense is very vanilla and the other teams seem to always have the perfect play picked out. Ditto for our offense. Dink and dunk...hand off up the middle. I am starting to agree with some of these posts it might be time to get rid of Holt and Kiffin.
Posted by: Patrick | October 9, 2006 05:30 PM
Not anything new for SC. Remember the 04 Cal game when Aaron Rodgers completed something like 26 in a row. Bend but don't break has always been an SC plan.
The goal is to make the opposition settle for field goals to try to force things and thus turnovers.
Its important to remember in the UW game we could have picked Stanback off on three separate drives but failed to do so. Players were in the right positions but didn't make the plays.
Posted by: PH55 | October 9, 2006 05:48 PM
Simple solution....play less cover 2!
Posted by: JA | October 9, 2006 08:44 PM
Patrick, Redcorn, F'ed zoons, and the other naysayers need catscans forthwith. Situation critical.
Posted by: gereboy | October 9, 2006 09:44 PM
It's hard not to criticize the play calling, both offensively and defensively. But...
I believe in PC. He's a winner and I'm sure he's aware of his team's problems. He'll bring out the best of both Kiffin and Holt. Holt is not that much at fault w/an inexperienced secondary, but Kiffin is just too predictable. In the end, I think PC will help SC win even the close ones.
Ohio State, if we get that far, is playing at a different level...
Hang on and be patient, there's still a lot of football left to play - believe in PC!!
Posted by: Desert Trojan | October 9, 2006 09:58 PM
They play cover two due to inexperience. They will play less cover two as they gain experience.
Posted by: cv | October 10, 2006 07:04 AM
Some of these posts are funny. "We are 5-0! what could be wrong!" Hell, Rutgers is undefeated too, that doesn't mean they will win the BCS. At one point Notre Dame was undefeated,...BUT THEY ARE NOT ANYMORE. And that's what's going to happen to USC if they don't get things fixed. Cop out.
Just like the "We are inexperienced" cop out. Sure, there are players like Mays and Moody who have no experience out there. There are also players like Lua and LoJack who have a ton of experience. DALLAS SARTZ IS A FIFTH YEAR SENIOR! There are also alot of players with a decent amount of experience like Sed Ellis and Keith Rivers. What about DJ? He has no experience? JDB has been at SC and in the system for 3 years. Game experience. What is so difficult?
These posts act like we have an entire squad of 18 year old true frosh out there on offense and defense. Not true at all. Yep we are breaking in some new guys. But alot of teams are.
In other words, let's leave the excuses to the Notre Dame fans. They are the best at it.
Does anyone else get a feeling the team needs an attitude adjustment? They went and stood on the "WSU" logo at midfield, and basically phoned in the game last week, waiting for Washington to roll over and die.
Posted by: Patrick | October 10, 2006 11:55 AM
Does anyone remember a world before 2002? If we are honest, all SC fans have gotten spoiled over the last 4 years.
Does anyone really think the 2006 team is better than the 2002 team? I didn't think so. So why do so many people expect anything less than the BCS title game to be a wasted season?
Reality is this is an extremely young team beset by injuries to key players. This does not translate into a 12 or 13 win season. A 10 win season with a foundation for a BCS title run in '07 is much more realistic.
Carroll and his young staff's strength is not game management. He and the staff do a lot of other things (recruiting, motivation, teaching and preparation) extremely well, but his quirky sideline decisions were never analyzed until the 4th and 2 in the Rose Bowl. PC was given too much credit for halftime adjustments in the past. Often it was simply a matter of the opponent (who was down by 2 or 3 touchdowns by the middle of the 3rd quarter) going one-dimensional by necessity.
Now that the Trojans are no longer 3 touchdowns better than everyone they play, the defense is going to have to play 4 solid quarters.
Posted by: OC Nels | October 10, 2006 02:07 PM