Another Weird Stat

"Statistics are for losers..." Charlie Weis after ND lost to USC 44-24

Who cares? It was a fluke run.

What a waste of bandwidth that was.

What a tortured first sentence. You should have said, "This season, UCLA's defense held four consecutive opponents to fewer than 60 yards rushing."

Vivian's Blog Entry Report Card: D-

It's a good thing you have an editor.

I really hope that you're trying to stir up the linebackers. Would love to see them angry and looking to take it out on someone this Saturday.

Arcane and irrelevant, like the price of fish in China.

Agree with mike. ND was held to between 60-70 yards for the rest of the game after Quinn's scamper.

In statistics that is called an aberration. Next?

Meaningless broken play after which the Irish failed to convert. That one's a reach Scott.

Weird?

Is that the word of the week they taught you in journalism skool?

That's why your so used to low grades... It all makes sense now.

That run by Quinn got me all hot and bothered.

That's a prime example of what I've been saying all season long about Rey Maualuga continually getting caught out of position.

USC/UCLA GAME IS ABOUT FIRE IN THE BELLY, HOW BAD YOU WANT IT?? USC HAS BEEN ON FIRE LAST 3 GAMES AND WILL BE ALSO BE SMOKIN FOR THIS ONE--- USC WILL BE ON THE BRUINS BACK THE WHOLE 60 MINUTES...

You people are such idiots!

Facts are facts. USC lost track of Brady Quinn and didn't catch him until he was 60 yards downfield.

But you idiots continue to just play it off. Typical blind fans.

Gee ... you dimwits don't care about that run ... but do you think Troy Smith does?

He will really put a hurting on USC, if they continue to make mistakes like that.

By the way, Vince Young didn't seem to mind the running room either.

Get your heads out our your behinds.