Who Won?
We almost forgot. Two representatives from the Sugar Bowl attended the game. They left early.
« About That Schedule | Main | An Even Dozen »
We almost forgot. Two representatives from the Sugar Bowl attended the game. They left early.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.insidesocal.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/22712
Comments
I noticed them as they came by the C&G tailgate. Needless to say I broke into laughter.
Posted by: USC_89
|
October 14, 2007 03:17 PM
That's what happens when they don't serve beer at the Coliseum anymore.
Posted by: Petingtong
|
October 14, 2007 03:21 PM
Scott, sometimes you are pretty darn funny! I cracked up when I read that.
Posted by: MarathonRunner
|
October 14, 2007 03:27 PM
Unless marked improvement is shown in on-field execution and in getting healthy, USC is looking at a postseason shocker.
Right now with the PAC-10 out of the BCS CG, on paper USC is battling it out with the lesser of Cal, Oregon, and ASU for the Sun Bowl. I'm basing this on performance and not seeing the current USC team beating these other 3 teams on the road.
I'm hoping USC runs the table abd locks up another BCS/Rose Bowl but also being a realist.
There's always the Hawaii, Las Vegas, or dare I say Emerald Bowl?
Posted by: Trojan&Tonic
|
October 14, 2007 04:01 PM
Are you people for real? We're playing THIRD STRING offensive linemen. Give the team a break. No other program in the nation would be 5-1 with a patchwork offensive line playing guys that are a small step from walk on (read as: scout team) on the offensive line.
Posted by: baxterbob
|
October 14, 2007 04:39 PM
Did it ever cross anyone's mind USC might win a game it's not supposed to?
Posted by: mike
|
October 14, 2007 04:57 PM
Thank you Baxterbob, an actual Trojan fan who has their crainium out of their rectal cavity, unlike a majority of people who post here. Lets wait and see when ALL of the O-Line gets healthy, and you will see what happens.
Posted by: trojnfn72
|
October 14, 2007 05:57 PM
Injuries are a lame excuse for losing. A injury problem didn't bother Cal vs. OSU..oh yea, whoops! I mean, a injury problem didn't bother UCLA vs. ND..whoops, again! I mean, I think Butch Lewis and Luther Brown did a great job filling in. USC will be a completely different team if Johnson returns against ND (and one or two OL). Hope Sanchez can handle the crowd. Keep the faith!
Posted by: HS Dropout
|
October 14, 2007 09:01 PM
Sugar bowl reps don't matter this year...aren't they contractually obligated to take #1 and #2. What a lame blog entry...
Posted by: respectthegame
|
October 14, 2007 09:30 PM
USC isn't playing for a chance at the Sugar Bowl. They're playing for the BCS championship. Two different bowls, same stadium.
Posted by: Class of 2007
|
October 14, 2007 10:00 PM
Hey Respect:
I don't know for sure, but the Sugar Bowl reps may be representing the Sugar Bowl game on 1/1, not the NC game played four days later in the Superdome. (They are doing the plus-one system. Last year, the Fiesta Bowl game was Boise St-Okl before the NC game b/w Fla-OSU.)
If so, they may have interest at looking at a potential at-large team like USC to play the SEC champ or another at-large team.
Posted by: uscmike
|
October 14, 2007 10:04 PM
uscmike hit it on the head. They're looking at USC to possibly play LSU if LSU can't climb back into the NC picture. It's a game the Tiger fans have wanted for years...
Posted by: Tyler
|
October 14, 2007 11:39 PM
Baxter Bob...thanks for pointing that out. In fact, duering one series we had three third string and two second string OL in the game.
Posted by: uschoopnut
|
October 15, 2007 12:17 AM
Thanks for the clarification.
Posted by: respectthegame
|
October 15, 2007 07:11 AM
None of the teams ranked above USC in the BCS standings would be there with the injuries the Trojans had/have on the O-line, Linebackers, RB's and QB. Getting Stafon and Cush back would be nice and at least one O-line starter.
Not sure if I'd call it a Plus One system as that is acually a proposed system that would create a BCS championship matchup AFTER all the other Bowl games have been played.
The current system has a stand alone Championship game based on the final #1 and #2 in the BCS Standings. In effect another BCS bowl was added to appease the mid-majors like Utah, Boise, & Hawaii.
Posted by: Trojan&Tonic
|
October 15, 2007 08:53 AM