Quick Thought
How come no one is asking whether USC can bring back Lane Kiffin with his Raiders future in doubt?
|
|
|
How come no one is asking whether USC can bring back Lane Kiffin with his Raiders future in doubt?
| For more local Southern California News: | Copyright © |
| Los Angeles Newspaper group |
Maybe because Kiffin was awful here at USC. His play calling almost made me want Paul Hackett back.
If they bring him back after his Senior Bowl play calling, then you know the program is in trouble.
Because it's a forgone conclusion that the Weisel over at Taxpayer U will hire him. Isn't that where all the unwanted X SC coaches go when they are washed up?
All of this "cherry-picking" the USC staff sounds like ChowWalkerHeisel are malcontents forming a rival company. The question is, what are they angry about? If they are as good as some FUCLA'ers think they are, then they should be happy. The rhetoric from Neuheisel makes me think this is more about revenge than building a good program, and the players will be the victims.
Remember: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. FUCLA knows the real thing is across town.
Just ask yourselves this questions Trojan fans:
Would you rather have Chow and Walker or Nick "I-have-a-bald-head-and-scream-really-loud" Holt and Steve "I-call-a-draw-on-every-3rd-and-long" Sarkisian?
Face it folks, Pete's coaching staff is a joke. But, he has set himself up to get all the credit if they somehow win another championship. No more Chows, Orgerons, Davis' or Smiths to have to share it with. Ironic though that by doing so, that will never happen.
Ya know 89, your return to this board after your well enjoyed by all hiatus, brings this blog to a new low. Anxiously awaiting your next long absence.
Goliathtrojan
The receivers certainly didn't drop as many balls on Lane's watch.