Spotlight answer

| | Comments (4) |

Q: Why are scholarship reductions and the cost of USC as a private institution being used as excuses for why the baseball team has hit an all-time low, when other private schools -- such as Rice, Vanderbilt and Stanford -- are all currently highly ranked in the national polls?
Their tuition costs are similar to that of USC, so is it not inherently flawed to say that USC's baseball team is now suffering due to the costs that come from awarding partial scholarships at a private university when other similar institutions are not suffering the same fate?

Answer after the jump.

A: This is a common argument, but there are always nuances to making general statements. For example, when Stanford gives a partial scholarship, the athlete also receives any financial aid they are eligible for. USC would award a partial scholarship and count it against any financial aid. So where do you think a player would go between those two schools if he paid $10,000 more at USC?
Also, are Vanderbilt or Rice surrounded by Cal State Fullerton, Long Beach State, UCLA, UC Irvine, Pepperdine, LMU, UC Santa Barbara, UC Riverside, etc.
The biggest problem for private schools is they have a smaller pool of players because of the cost, so there is almost no margin of error. If you give a scholarship, the player has to perform because there won't be other candidate to pick up the slack.

4 Comments

johnmark Author Profile Page said:

Keep in mind that SC has in the past recruited some of the "cream of the crop" that signed with MLB. Therefore, maybe a 4-Star player SC didn't sign, went to Stanford, while the 5-Star SC recruited, signed a major league contract. Now SC has to go to a 3-Star player or whatever is left.

Mrtravlear726 Author Profile Page said:

What would you expect them to say? We have a crappy coach? This is a bit like Notre Dame being down in football. The Domers claim that it is not the Coaches (and their football ills go back well before Weis's arrival) fault, it's our academic standards!

Josh Author Profile Page said:

this is a test

55-19 Author Profile Page said:

Seriously Wolf, there are 11 year old girls with better functioning blogs. Tell your internet guys to stop "fixing" it.

Leave a comment

About Inside USC

Scott Wolf has covered USC for the Daily News since 1996. A USC graduate, he covered his first Trojan game in 1984 for the Daily Trojan. Scott is known as the "scourge of the Internet message boards," according to radio host Petros Papadakis. Despite this moniker, there's no truth to the rumor he takes pleasure in antagonizing the "Internet geeks."

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Scott Wolf published on April 30, 2008 11:16 AM.

Who knew? was the previous entry in this blog.

Spring attendance is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

55-19 on Spotlight answer: Seriously Wolf, there are 11 year old girls with better functioning bl ...

Josh on Spotlight answer: this is a test ...

Mrtravlear726 on Spotlight answer: What would you expect them to say? We have a crappy coach? This is a ...

johnmark on Spotlight answer: Keep in mind that SC has in the past recruited some of the "cream of t ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

Advertisement

Other blogs

Our Daily Dread: Strausburg's bonus, baby in Farther Off the Wall
Answer Tuesday! in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Collison's workouts in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
Tuesday's Column: The U.S. National Team from a Global Perspective in 100 Percent Soccer
Goaltending? Seriously? in Inside the Lakers