Answer Monday, Part 3

Q: SW, any chance that you will ever get a video aspect added to your site/blog? I mention it for the following reasons:

1) you are reasonably good at communicating your ideas/views on video
2) it would help you compete with/steal traffic from sites like USCRipsit (or just get additional traffic)
3) fewer people would misunderstand you, your positions, and general sarcasm (most of communication is non-verbal, after all)

A: I think these are good suggestions and I'm going to look into adding more video features. I'm sure we'll do more during football season but I think this time of year, it would also be helpful, especially when answering reader questions.

Q: While an oldster from the glory days of the early Seventies, I rememember fondly of the great cheerleaders, I wonder... Does anyone have any consideration for the girls themselves today? Some pretty nasty shi*** comments. My daughter (third generation) graduated 3 years ago and, while not a song girl, I would be pissed at the hatefull rhetoric on this web. Enough has been said about how "ugly" they are. That's absurd, they aren't "quality", but not ugly... Can we lighten up a tad??

A: Sounds fair.

Q: Now that you've started posting pictures of the UCLA Dance Team, any chance you can post any pictures of the Oregon cheerleaders? Also, let me get my request in for any USC Song Girl pictures from 1995 to 1998. That was a great period, especially the squad during the 1996 Rose Bowl. Just please no pictures of any Song Girls from this decade.

A: I posted an Oregon picture Sunday and it seems to be popular with the readers. Tomorrow, I'll be posting another USC song girl photo that will be popular, I believe.