Did Caesar take a shot at John David Booty while discussing the deep-passing game?
``Our emphasis is not different (this year) but we're better at it right now than the last couple years,'' he said. ``Mark (Sanchez) has a real knack.''
This is where you leave me Mr. Wolf. Your embrace of the Hollywood gossip columnist approach that immediately goes to ooh and ah versus a statement of fact. I really think you are better suited to the feminine side of reporting as evidenced by your preoccupation with the song girl issue to which you so tenderly cling.
It's football Mr. Wolf. It's not fashion design or home decorating.
Mr. Wolf. Here is Coach Carroll's quote from Scout.com: “Our emphasis isn’t any different than it has ever been, but I think we are better at it right now. Mark has a real knack..."
The emphasis is on "right now." Not "the last 2 years" as you made up in your post. Do you now begin to see the growing loathing readers have for your style of reporting?
Fat Booster said:
What a muckraker you are, Wolf. Only you could view Carroll's compliment of Sanchez as veiled dig at Booty.
Trojan_SF said:
Shouldn't Booty being saying, "Et tu, Carroll?"
I'm assuming the title of this post is a reference to "Julius Caesar." From what I remember, Caesar asks "Et tu, Brutus?" to one of his assassins (Brutus). This post suggests that Booty was traitorous to Carroll.
If you are going to be dour and loathing, at least be accurate about it.
The Donkey says:
"Scott you are such a scandalous bitch!"
TrojanFoeLife said:
Well, it is what it is. Every quarterback has their own style. Sanchez just happens to be more savvy in throwing the deep passes, is all. Booty, a more efficient short and medium range passer. Hey, he still got us two more Rose Bowls!
El Capitán said:
TrojanFoeLife:
Mark Sánchez is a better QB: "Well, it is what it is". If you can read check again:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/johnson-usc-yards-2184858-booty-average
If you are going to quote from an article be man or whatever the hell you are and do it accurately. Don't twist someone's statements and mold them like yours. That is called plagiarism. Is that how you made it through school at USC?
Lane Kiffin said:
Pete needs to take some shots at his OC's once in awhile. Booty didnt throw long with Kiffy because Kiffy wouldnt throw long. And Booty couldnt throw long with Sark because Sark just liked that big heave down the middle. You know the ones that were picked over and over vs Stanford.
TrojanFoeLife said:
Hey El Capitán,
U must be an English major, right. Probably at some JC or worse UCLA!!!!!!!!! Relax homeboy! Just a comment.......This isn't some mid-term paper that needed to be corrected by a professor! This is called BLOGGING......... not Upper Division Report Writing.
El Capitán said:
TrojanFoeLife:
Clintonian boy you are wrong: anything but an English major. How about fifty plus college credit hours in Chemistry alone sound? Just because this is "BLOGGING" it doesn't give you the right to steal/plagiarize and then twist the truth to mold your "BLOGGING". That goes to credibility.
Thank you
TrojanFoeLife said:
WOW! 50+ Hours of Chemistry......... Hey Scott, u think u could hire this guy when you step away on vacation. Same tone of rhetoric.
Truth hurts...
This is where you leave me Mr. Wolf. Your embrace of the Hollywood gossip columnist approach that immediately goes to ooh and ah versus a statement of fact. I really think you are better suited to the feminine side of reporting as evidenced by your preoccupation with the song girl issue to which you so tenderly cling.
It's football Mr. Wolf. It's not fashion design or home decorating.
Mr. Wolf. Here is Coach Carroll's quote from Scout.com: “Our emphasis isn’t any different than it has ever been, but I think we are better at it right now. Mark has a real knack..."
The emphasis is on "right now." Not "the last 2 years" as you made up in your post. Do you now begin to see the growing loathing readers have for your style of reporting?
What a muckraker you are, Wolf. Only you could view Carroll's compliment of Sanchez as veiled dig at Booty.
Shouldn't Booty being saying, "Et tu, Carroll?"
I'm assuming the title of this post is a reference to "Julius Caesar." From what I remember, Caesar asks "Et tu, Brutus?" to one of his assassins (Brutus). This post suggests that Booty was traitorous to Carroll.
If you are going to be dour and loathing, at least be accurate about it.
The Donkey says:
"Scott you are such a scandalous bitch!"
Well, it is what it is. Every quarterback has their own style. Sanchez just happens to be more savvy in throwing the deep passes, is all. Booty, a more efficient short and medium range passer. Hey, he still got us two more Rose Bowls!
TrojanFoeLife:
Mark Sánchez is a better QB: "Well, it is what it is". If you can read check again:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/johnson-usc-yards-2184858-booty-average
If you are going to quote from an article be man or whatever the hell you are and do it accurately. Don't twist someone's statements and mold them like yours. That is called plagiarism. Is that how you made it through school at USC?
Pete needs to take some shots at his OC's once in awhile. Booty didnt throw long with Kiffy because Kiffy wouldnt throw long. And Booty couldnt throw long with Sark because Sark just liked that big heave down the middle. You know the ones that were picked over and over vs Stanford.
Hey El Capitán,
U must be an English major, right. Probably at some JC or worse UCLA!!!!!!!!! Relax homeboy! Just a comment.......This isn't some mid-term paper that needed to be corrected by a professor! This is called BLOGGING......... not Upper Division Report Writing.
TrojanFoeLife:
Clintonian boy you are wrong: anything but an English major. How about fifty plus college credit hours in Chemistry alone sound? Just because this is "BLOGGING" it doesn't give you the right to steal/plagiarize and then twist the truth to mold your "BLOGGING". That goes to credibility.
Thank you
WOW! 50+ Hours of Chemistry......... Hey Scott, u think u could hire this guy when you step away on vacation. Same tone of rhetoric.