A spectacular run by Joe McKnight is wiped out with a fumble. A burning question this week was who would fumble first, McKnight or Jahvid Best? The answer: Mark Sanchez.
11 Comments
jdusc said:
Bench McKnight.
J D said:
Based on play the entire offense would need to get benched after tonight's performance.
Trojan_SF said:
That was a very good Cal defense we faced. We moved the ball with some consistency at times, but the mental errors are infuriating. Thankfully, our D is one of the best, if not the best, of all time.
Fight On!
kptrojan said:
Trojan_SF just hit the nail on the head. But of course, num-nuts Wolfeee is only concerned about trying to get his mug shot taken with cheerleaders, rather than writing out useful information. So how long before you post another picture of you with the Cal cheerleaders Wolfeee? Fight On!
TrojanRick said:
With ALL the penalties and awful playcalling, the fact that the Trojans did not allow California ONE touchdown the entire game - and this is an opponent that was averaging over 30 points per game.
Yes, once again, the defense won it.
But style-points - sorry Craig, not tonight.
TTech - #1
Alabama - #2
Florida - #3
Oklahoma - #4
Texas - #5
USC - #6
Utah - #7 (they are undefeated, but...)
Penn State - #8
Forget the rest as of the moment.
It's rather obvious at the moment that McNight is just as much a liability to the team as an asset. His plays make me nervous. Forget about The Second Coming of Reggie Bush. I'd like to see them use Stafon Johnson and C.J. Gable more when running the ball in the middle and NOT use McNight in that type of plays. It's just a waste of downs. It appears McNight is even more of a scat-back than Bush ever was.
TROJANAZ said:
Is it Sanchez or Sark? They are terrible in the red zone.
TROJANAZ said:
Is it Sanchez or Sark? They are terrible in the red zone.
I think it's Sark. Since he's been in charge of the offense, it's been boring and uncreative. I don't believe he's utilizing the talent they've got in the most productive ways. I feel that they need someone who's more experienced to run the offense.
El Capitán said:
Despite all the problems and criticisms the team is 8-1. Yes, Mark fumbled. The team only loss according to ESPN Lee Corso the USC defense gave-up in the second half. Yes, Mark threw a critical INT on that game. He also threw for three TD's meaning he did his job. Yet Mr. SW doesn't waste any chance to blast Mark. Hey SW if you want blood contact the Red Cross. I'd dare to say MM would NOT have this team 8-1 had he played.
The rest of the guys around here have done a good job trashing Sark's awful play calling...
Thank you
Bench McKnight.
Based on play the entire offense would need to get benched after tonight's performance.
That was a very good Cal defense we faced. We moved the ball with some consistency at times, but the mental errors are infuriating. Thankfully, our D is one of the best, if not the best, of all time.
Fight On!
Trojan_SF just hit the nail on the head. But of course, num-nuts Wolfeee is only concerned about trying to get his mug shot taken with cheerleaders, rather than writing out useful information. So how long before you post another picture of you with the Cal cheerleaders Wolfeee? Fight On!
With ALL the penalties and awful playcalling, the fact that the Trojans did not allow California ONE touchdown the entire game - and this is an opponent that was averaging over 30 points per game.
Yes, once again, the defense won it.
But style-points - sorry Craig, not tonight.
TTech - #1
Alabama - #2
Florida - #3
Oklahoma - #4
Texas - #5
USC - #6
Utah - #7 (they are undefeated, but...)
Penn State - #8
Forget the rest as of the moment.
It's rather obvious at the moment that McNight is just as much a liability to the team as an asset. His plays make me nervous. Forget about The Second Coming of Reggie Bush. I'd like to see them use Stafon Johnson and C.J. Gable more when running the ball in the middle and NOT use McNight in that type of plays. It's just a waste of downs. It appears McNight is even more of a scat-back than Bush ever was.
Is it Sanchez or Sark? They are terrible in the red zone.
Is it Sanchez or Sark? They are terrible in the red zone.
I think it's Sark. Since he's been in charge of the offense, it's been boring and uncreative. I don't believe he's utilizing the talent they've got in the most productive ways. I feel that they need someone who's more experienced to run the offense.
Despite all the problems and criticisms the team is 8-1. Yes, Mark fumbled. The team only loss according to ESPN Lee Corso the USC defense gave-up in the second half. Yes, Mark threw a critical INT on that game. He also threw for three TD's meaning he did his job. Yet Mr. SW doesn't waste any chance to blast Mark. Hey SW if you want blood contact the Red Cross. I'd dare to say MM would NOT have this team 8-1 had he played.
The rest of the guys around here have done a good job trashing Sark's awful play calling...
Thank you
3 td's?