Mark Sanchez threw 31 passes against Notre Dame. He threw 32 against the Irish last year . . . in the first half.
2 Comments
kptrojan said:
What does it matter? He could have thrown 60 passes and 500 yards and you would have been complaning "where's Mitch".
Joe McKnight could have run 200 yard, while CJ,Stafon and Mark Tyler could have all bolted for 100 yards each, and your reaction would have been "why didn't the Trojans throw more".
Nothing makes you happy unless you are complaining about everything.
Evil Robot said:
SC had 33 pass attempts and 33 running attempts, which in my book is pretty good balance. You, in your (very) poor man's TJ Simers impersonation, imply that there is something wrong with that because it was different from how the game went in the previous year. One year is 38-0, the other is 38-3, exactly what is your point. Yes, that was rhetorical.
Leave a comment
About Inside USC
Scott Wolf has covered USC for the Daily News since 1996. A USC
graduate, he covered his first Trojan game in 1984 for
the Daily Trojan. Scott is known as the "scourge of the Internet
message boards," according to radio host Petros Papadakis. Despite this
moniker, there's no truth to the rumor he takes pleasure in
antagonizing the "Internet geeks."
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Scott Wolf published on November 30, 2008 4:20 PM.
What does it matter? He could have thrown 60 passes and 500 yards and you would have been complaning "where's Mitch".
Joe McKnight could have run 200 yard, while CJ,Stafon and Mark Tyler could have all bolted for 100 yards each, and your reaction would have been "why didn't the Trojans throw more".
Nothing makes you happy unless you are complaining about everything.
SC had 33 pass attempts and 33 running attempts, which in my book is pretty good balance. You, in your (very) poor man's TJ Simers impersonation, imply that there is something wrong with that because it was different from how the game went in the previous year. One year is 38-0, the other is 38-3, exactly what is your point. Yes, that was rhetorical.