Answer Monday! (Part 13)
So should we keep the readers' names in front of the questions? Thoughts?
Q: Mike said:
would the morons at ESPN have rated ucla as high as 16 on their recent prestige rankings if they had not incorrectly stated that ucla had never been on probation? Apparently their research didn't go back as far as 1980.
A: Who goofed? I've got to know.
Q: MODEVIL said:
How much of Mark Sanchez's decision do you think had to do with the how conservative the play calling was this past season. He can't forget about the UCLA and Cal games where they basically took the ball away from him for the entire second half.
A: I know for a fact he chafed at the playcalling this season. But if I know Pete Carroll, he promised a wide-open offense and more aggressive playcalling with an experienced QB coming back. It wasn't enough to convince to return, however. Much like I said regarding the argument Sanchez could be one of the best QBs in the nation next year, if Carroll said the offense would be wide open, Sanchez could always ask why he didn't trust him enough this past season.



Sure, put the names on the questions. But honestly, I don't care who asked the question.