The track team competes in the West Regionals at Eugene, Ore., while the rowing and men's golf teams are in the NCAA championships.
2 Comments
silverlake-bruin said:
Since many of your readers asked, here is the report on UCLA Tennis. Notice what happens when an institution finds out something wrong has happened and self reports the violation. Has USC ever self reported a violation?
r:
The men's tennis student-athlete involved was earning money working at a job. The employer paid his student fees, thinking it was okay because the student-athlete would be earning the money to cover the fees.
When the UCLA compliance office found out that the employer had paid the student fees in advance, it reported the situation to the NCAA and the Pac-10 Conference. The NCAA reinstated the student-athlete's eligibility, deciding the employment and the rate of pay appropriate, and required him to pay a portion of the fee value to a charity. The student-athlete was eligible to compete in the 2008-09 season and did so.
The Pac-10 Compliance and Enforcement Committee requested the student-athlete forfeit his singles and doubles matches in Pac-10 competition in 2007-08. That action was approved by the Pac-10 Council. The changes in scores ultimately changed the final results of UCLA's matches versus USC and Arizona State from wins to losses.
GoTroyGo said:
SC has self reported when it has come to light there has been an infraction. Welcome back Silerdick. BTW, we don't care, it's only Fucla and tennis.
Since many of your readers asked, here is the report on UCLA Tennis. Notice what happens when an institution finds out something wrong has happened and self reports the violation. Has USC ever self reported a violation?
r:
The men's tennis student-athlete involved was earning money working at a job. The employer paid his student fees, thinking it was okay because the student-athlete would be earning the money to cover the fees.
When the UCLA compliance office found out that the employer had paid the student fees in advance, it reported the situation to the NCAA and the Pac-10 Conference. The NCAA reinstated the student-athlete's eligibility, deciding the employment and the rate of pay appropriate, and required him to pay a portion of the fee value to a charity. The student-athlete was eligible to compete in the 2008-09 season and did so.
The Pac-10 Compliance and Enforcement Committee requested the student-athlete forfeit his singles and doubles matches in Pac-10 competition in 2007-08. That action was approved by the Pac-10 Council. The changes in scores ultimately changed the final results of UCLA's matches versus USC and Arizona State from wins to losses.
SC has self reported when it has come to light there has been an infraction. Welcome back Silerdick. BTW, we don't care, it's only Fucla and tennis.