USC No. 7 In BCS
USC is No. 7 in today's first BCS poll. Iowa, Boise State and Cincinnati are currently ahead of the Trojans. Full standings after the jump.
1. Florida (6-0) .9886 N/A 1 2802 .9832 1 1464 .9925 1 99 .990
2. Alabama (7-0) .9526 N/A 2 2736 .9600 2 1398 .9478 2 95 .950
3. Texas (6-0) .8911 N/A 3 2661 .9337 3 1386 .9397 6 80 .800
4. Boise State (6-0) .8083 N/A 5 2289 .8032 5 1153 .7817 5 84 .840
5. Cincinnati (6-0) .7870 N/A 6 2173 .7625 6 1104 .7485 4 85 .850
6. Iowa (7-0) .7869 N/A 7 2045 .7175 8 1037 .7031 3 94 .940
7. USC (5-1) .7695 N/A 4 2394 .8400 4 1237 .8386 11 63 .630
8. Texas Christian (6-0) .7139 N/A 8 2015 .7070 7 1069 .7247 8 71 .710
9. LSU (5-1) .7083 N/A 9 1996 .7004 10 995 .6746 7 75 .750
10. Miami (Fla.) (5-1) .6273 N/A 10 1896 .6653 9 998 .6766 13 54 .540
11. Oregon (5-1) .5849 N/A 12 1577 .5533 14 769 .5214 9 68 .680
12. Georgia Tech (6-1) .5702 N/A 13 1489 .5225 13 779 .5281 10 66 .660
13. Penn State (6-1) .4982 N/A 11 1620 .5684 11 894 .6061 17 32 .320
14. Virginia Tech (5-2) .4947 N/A 15 1278 .4484 15 672 .4556 12 58 .580
15. Oklahoma State (5-1) .4043 N/A 14 1436 .5039 12 795 .5390 21 17 .170
16. Brigham Young (6-1) .2986 N/A 16 1210 .4246 16 577 .3912 25 8 .080
17. Houston (5-1) .2660 N/A 18 834 .2926 18 421 .2854 18 22 .220
18. Utah (5-1) .2511 N/A 19 627 .2200 20 300 .2034 14 33 .330
19. Ohio State (5-2) .2216 N/A 17 937 .3288 17 481 .3261 32 1 .010
20. Pittsburgh (6-1) .2012 N/A 20 545 .1912 19 328 .2224 20 19 .190
21. Wisconsin (5-2) .1180 N/A 38 18 .0063 31 26 .0176 14 33 .330
22. Arizona (4-2) .1138 N/A 37 19 .0067 40 7 .0047 14 33 .330
23. West Virginia (5-1) .1113 N/A 23 275 .0965 22 188 .1275 24 11 .110
24. South Carolina (5-2) .1040 N/A 26 216 .0758 23 142 .0963 22 14 .140
25. Kansas (5-1) .0973 N/A 21 403 .1414 21 222 .1505 33 0 .000
Yeah, but Pete says he doesnt care or think about the BCS rankings since they are "out of his control". Apprantaly Pete doesnt see how winning and losing games (something he says he can control) relates to the BCS rankings.
Pete hates the BCS because it doesnt treat teams who continually lose games they should win very well.
Once again, USC'89 didn't get their milk and cookies.
Plenty of football left, BCS only matters at the end of the season. Until then, just keeping improving on offense and stop the personal fouls.
Fight On!
Some interesting statistics:
The teams that are ranked in the BCS poll and not ranked by Scott:
Penn State, Houston, Wisconsin, and Arizona. (There is also Texas Christian, but that's a surprise).
The teams that are ranked by Scott and not in the BCS poll:
TCU, Nebraska, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, Idaho.
Texas still has Kansas, Mizzu, @ Ok St, and the B12 championship game. Cinci still has Big East rivals Uconn, West Va, and Pitt. Iowa is still at 3 game winning streak Mich St and at Ohio St. All of these teams are likely to lose a game yet.
However, Boise St kills me. They only play one more team with a winning record: Idaho! What a joke. Their schedule simply isn’t strong enough to warrant serious BCS candidacy. Fortunately, USC still has games against ranked BCS teams - Oregon and Arizona - so our computer rankings should increase quite a bit if we finish undefeated. Enough to pass Boise and Cinci for sure. Still, Autzen could render the discussion moot.
Sure Nordeezy...they will come back from Wash tragedy and make it in end...just like they did from tragedy's in 2006, 2007 and 2008.
"Apprantaly Pete"...
Well said Cap, I don't know why they don't use a dictionary. Besides, USC'89 is a member of the wanker class for his total negativism.
Cap, rotfalmao!!! that USC89 learned to spell at his true alma mater..El Camino JC!
Cap, rotfalmao!!! that USC89 learned to spell at his true alma mater..El Camino JC!
'89 was probably when he got rejected by USC
lol buslu TCU = Texas Christian University
'89 was the year he went to Sears to buy a USC t-shirt...and he is still wearing it.
Only one game on the schedule: Oregon State.