USC APR
USC's football scored a healthy 965 with its academic-progress report score. Here's the Pac-10 scores, which are four-year averages.
Stanford, 976
Cal, 969
USC, 965
UCLA, 953
Washington, 948
Oregon State, 947
Arizona State, 945
Oregon, 942
Arizona, 940
WSU, 918
UCLA second best once again.
The Ghost of Charlie Bucket won't be happy about this one.....
oooooOOOOOOOOOOoooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SWEET SCOOOOOOOP WOLFMAN!!!!!!!!
AUUUUUUUUU-WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UCLA trails USC by a greater margin than USC trails first-place Stanford.
Folks, I'm only an interested observer here and have no attachment to SC, but the UCLA trolls on here sure are childish and I hope this shuts them up.
Someone please cut and paste this for future reference when bRuin fans, confronted by the fact that USC is a superior football team, resort to the trite reply "yeah, but we're smarter."
The only thing this report proves is that the NCAA has more to look into at Fu$c than Bushgate and the payo to Mayo.
I would look into which $c students are actually taking the classes and doing the coursework for the trogan football team.
This report means nothing, but I will agree with Fu$cmike that as of last season the trogans have a superior football team.
smother my body in honey and give me a ticket to the willy wonka factory. that is a ooo ooo ooo syrupy suuhweet scoop, wolfie
aaauuu
Well the student athletes at UCLA have accomplished something that Rick Neuheisel still has not been able to pull off: UCLA #4 in the Pac-10 Conference. Study On!
Yeah, but we're screwed this year unless Jeff Byers gets another year of eligibility. He's worth 100 points on APR alone.