Unlike Chad Kreuter, I'm hearing only good things about new baseball coach Frank Cruz from those within the program. Actually, I never heard any good things about Kreuter.
4 Comments
ThaiMex said:
O.K.....you idiots (knubs/science 5, Roscoe, etc)..Coach Cruz, as I've stated before is a knowledgeable coach, good recruiter, and has great connections. He COMES FROM A VERY FINE FAMILY (unlike knobs and his pack of dogs) and will succeed if given the chance. He has a very good reputation Locally, and Nationally. You arrogant bastards are lucky to have him.
(hey knubs....his parents were originally from douglas Arizona and not banjo picking, no shoe wearing, sister marrying SCum like your ancestors from West Virginia...Does that show up on wikipedia?)
You guys got lucky on this one...but things will even out with the Lame hire.
Coach Crus is a very proud, honest young man...unlike the butt kissing, phony football coach. His honest approach, though, did result n him leaving LMU.
KNUBS....you really don't know sh!t...and are as informed and INSIDE savy as "Small Time Thinker".
Wannabe's and only wannabe's.
jrod2sc said:
Funny, I can say the same thing (the not hearing anything good part) about Scott Wolf and his writing and reporting skills. Hey Scott, are all these digs at present and previous coaches a sign of your insecurity about your professional skills and accomplishments? Face it, you are a hack!
Trojan Rewind said:
face it JRod...you are the typical Internet geek that Wolf talks about it...you just don't want to hear the truth...you only want "feel good" stories to make you happy like nothing bad ever happens at USC. Keep reading the blog and making it one of the biggest ones around, geek.
Free_Thinker said:
Actually, I think Jrod makes good points. Contrary to Rewind's assertions, those who find Wolf to be an under-performing journalist are not necessarily looking for sugar coated reportage. I bet most of us expect a lot from SC's programs and are more than willing to hear the bad along with the good.
However, calling what Wolf prints "the truth" is weak. Anyone with a minimum of critical reasoning skills can find plenty of holes in Wolf's "journalism." His writing is bombastic, bloated with self-important opinion and infused with the kind of hyperbole found in the writing of high school-aged sportswriters.
I might not call him a hack, but Wolf's a long way from being a Pulitzer Prize nominee.
O.K.....you idiots (knubs/science 5, Roscoe, etc)..Coach Cruz, as I've stated before is a knowledgeable coach, good recruiter, and has great connections. He COMES FROM A VERY FINE FAMILY (unlike knobs and his pack of dogs) and will succeed if given the chance. He has a very good reputation Locally, and Nationally. You arrogant bastards are lucky to have him.
(hey knubs....his parents were originally from douglas Arizona and not banjo picking, no shoe wearing, sister marrying SCum like your ancestors from West Virginia...Does that show up on wikipedia?)
You guys got lucky on this one...but things will even out with the Lame hire.
Coach Crus is a very proud, honest young man...unlike the butt kissing, phony football coach. His honest approach, though, did result n him leaving LMU.
KNUBS....you really don't know sh!t...and are as informed and INSIDE savy as "Small Time Thinker".
Wannabe's and only wannabe's.
Funny, I can say the same thing (the not hearing anything good part) about Scott Wolf and his writing and reporting skills. Hey Scott, are all these digs at present and previous coaches a sign of your insecurity about your professional skills and accomplishments? Face it, you are a hack!
face it JRod...you are the typical Internet geek that Wolf talks about it...you just don't want to hear the truth...you only want "feel good" stories to make you happy like nothing bad ever happens at USC. Keep reading the blog and making it one of the biggest ones around, geek.
Actually, I think Jrod makes good points. Contrary to Rewind's assertions, those who find Wolf to be an under-performing journalist are not necessarily looking for sugar coated reportage. I bet most of us expect a lot from SC's programs and are more than willing to hear the bad along with the good.
However, calling what Wolf prints "the truth" is weak. Anyone with a minimum of critical reasoning skills can find plenty of holes in Wolf's "journalism." His writing is bombastic, bloated with self-important opinion and infused with the kind of hyperbole found in the writing of high school-aged sportswriters.
I might not call him a hack, but Wolf's a long way from being a Pulitzer Prize nominee.