Conference Breakdown
Here's a chart the Pac-10 provided today showing conference victories from 1997-2009.
Pac-12 North
Oregon 71
Oregon 57
Cal 50
Washington 46
Stanford 45
Washington State 41
Pac-12 South
USC 78
UCLA 58
Arizona State 52
Arizona 44
Colorado
Utah



I suppose the Oregon with 57 victory is Oregon State?
Looks like the Utes of Utah will be the South winner for years to come, MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
No offense, but I don't think Utes have the Stamina to go thru an entire BCS conference schedule yet.
The Utes have to recruit by PAC 12 academic standards. Let's see how well they do with that and full season of BCS level games.
I guess the Pac-10 feels those 14 vacated victories count afterall. That's the thing about history...you can try to rewrite it, but you can't change it. LMAO at the NCAA.
Pac-12 North
2011 Conference Standings?:
Oregon
Stanford
Oregon St.
Cal
Washington
Washington St.
USC
Utah
Arizona
Arizona St.
UCLA
Colorado
USC does not have any of the teams that beat them somewhat recently in their division. (I'm not counting the Az game)
All the north game will be battles (except Wa st).
Will the divisional games USC plays even be interesting when USC gets back to normal?
I also think the Utes will find pac12 harder than mtn west.
Here is how I would rank the teams for the near future:
North---
Oregon
Stanford
Or st
Wash
Cal
Wa st
South---
USC
Arizona
Utah
Arizona State
UCLA
Colorado
Pac 12 conference standards?? Like ASU admitting Burflic or whatever is name is? He can't read or write. Yeah, ASU, WSU, UA, OSU and Oregon have such high standards, HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Get ready for a Utah beat down toejams.
The Utes are a tough team and could give us problems but if that's the case what does it say about UCLA's prospects against them? It still surprises me to hear smack talk after a debacle like last night's game at the Ducks. I think that the Oregon outlook for us isn't bright but then again, I'm not popping off on a UCLA website.