Kiffin Quote Of The Day

“Kinda crazy, after watching the tape, we didn’t play all that well.”

— USC coach Lane Kiffin

33 thoughts on “Kiffin Quote Of The Day

  1. I’m starting to think Bruin Todd isn’t a real true blue Bruin. Jeanieus? Really?

    How in love with Lame Kitten will you dummies be after you lose by 17 to the Bruins this weekend! By the way, I’ll be bringing my RV down to you’re ghetto stadium this weekend and replaying the 13-9 game all tailgate long… come on by for a beer… or I’ll have some Zima’s for you TroBans.

    PS – nice win at Oregon… what bowl game did you secure with that win?

  2. @ucla fantasy (what dynasty are you referring to?) You do realize that USC has beat the bRuins 11 of the last 12 meetings and holds the overall series lead by a wide margin, don’t you? LOL, talk about “Yesterday U”!!! Where is TacoMax??!!! Oh, and what bowl game will Fucla be going to after they get creamed by SC and Oregon? FIGHT ON!

  3. Perhaps you missed our obliteration of Colorado while Oregon was serving up a win to you on a silver platter. Passing/running/special teams… we were dominant in all facets of the game while Oregon gave you the game. Check out Scott’s grades and take off your red colored glasses. He knew that your offense, defense and coaches were given that game.

    UCLA – 42
    $UC – 24

  4. Common dude,really? please dont tell me you Bruins are taking credit for an “obliteration” over a lowly Colorado squad. I hate to break this to you, but UCLA is just maybe 1 out of the 9 teams to “obliterate” Colorado.
    Man up and admit USC was a better team than Oregon on Saturday night.

  5. ……………….colorado is in the Bottom 10 in the nation. We won @ a Top 5 team. You really DIDN’T go to UCLA, obviously. LOL

  6. A lot of people say Oregon “handed” USC that game by missing the field goal at the end. Those same people do not acknowledge the fact that USC “handed” Oregon the opportunity to even ATTEMPT that missed field goal by fumbling the hand-off after driving to Oregon’s 10 yard line.
    Oregon is a great team, and it was a great game, but yes USC was the better team that night.

  7. Thank you for reading my post CAREFULLY and THOUGHTFULLY before jumping all over my back saying I’m a typical dumb ass BRUIN who comes here to stir up trouble. The fact is I’ve been reading this blog a LOT and finally decided to contribute since I have a lot of football knowledge. Let’s look at this logically. If we do that, then any reasonable person (and I do think some trojan fans are reasonble even though i detest usc), than you CANNOT DISPUTE THIS SIMPLE PROVEN MATH FORMULA: UCLA beat colorado 45 to 6, and usc only beat colorado 42 to 17. That means usc scored 2 points LESS and gave up 11 points MORE to our one common opponent. Don’t you see what I’m getting at???! This means we should, and will beat you but at least 13 points!!! 11 plus 2 = 13! Go BruinS!!!! Fight Fight Fight!

  8. WESTWOOD RULES, I am a very open minded person, but I’m sorry…that had to be one of the weakest arguments I have ever heard in my life.

    It’s hard to even tell if you were serious with that argument, or just simply providing us with some comic relief.

  9. dcard1097 (if I may call you that), of COURSE I am being serious. One thing i always tell my roomates is that you cannot argue with math. Math is always black and white and the results are factual. You cannot argue with facts. How can you not agree with me?

  10. Hahaha.

    Clearly, you’re a trojan, Westwood Rules. That’s classic. Funniest argument I’ve heard in some time.

    In case you’re being serious, what does the math say about the Bruin loss to AZ compared to the USC win? What about Utah? What would your roomates say?

  11. Stanford beat Cal 31-28

    USC beat Cal 30-9

    Stanford only scored 1 more point than USC, and gave up 19 more points than USC against a common opponent in Cal, so according to your math logic, USC should have beaten Stanford by 18 or so points. Obviously that didnt happen, so your math logic when it comes to football has just been proven irrelevant (and not to mention borderline ridiculous).

    This is football my friend.

  12. Mike Garrett is the AD who saved USC football twice. Pete Carroll and Lane Kiffin. Hope Pat the apologist Haden doesn’t f- it up. There is a reason why the number 21 hangs in the coliseum.

    Thank you Mike garrett Our best President Steve Sample Loved you. You were back stabbed by a two faced trustee who wanted to be AD.

  13. Guys, I really resent being told I am a trojan. I am a Bruin and always have been. My mom and dad both went to UCLA and I grew up going to the games. John Sciarra was one of my all time favorite QB’s and probably would have won the Heisman (given to the best football player in college football each year) if the voters knew ANYTHING about how to play QB in the Pac 8 (which it was at the time).

    Now about my math. The fact is the games you are mentioning, such as stanford and cal and utah and arizona, are completely irrelevant here. The reason why is because it’s the last game of the season, and Colorado is the last time UCLA played. Haven’t you ever heard the phrase, “you’re only as good as your last game”? Well, UCLA was pretty darn good in that one if I do say so myself! So the colorado game is the only one that applies in this case.

  14. Westood –

    John Sciarra played in the early to mid-1970s, which probably make you at least in your mid-40s. And you still have roomates? I don’t think anyone is falling for your “logic.” Very funny posts nonetheless.

  15. Westwood, your arguments are no longer worth a response. You clearly do not understand football. However, the comedy that your efforts have provided are appreciated.

  16. SCs defense just held the #1 rushing offense in check for 3&1/2 quarters at Autzen and got the win. Do you really think your fake (low on CO2) bee bee gun rush attack is going to be effective?

  17. This bickering is like arguing with your wife. You ain’t going to win or convince, even if you are right.

  18. OK so now you guys are telling me I’m trying to be funny. I have a message for you, Little Lawyer Johnson: I’m NOT trying to funny. I’m trying to make a rational arguement for why UCLA will win Saturday’s game. If you think that concept (the Bruins winning) is, in and of itself, funny, I get that. I understand you love u$c and don’t think UCLA can win, so in that sense what I’m saying is funny to you. But let me be very clear about something: This is NO JOKE. If the the late Bill Wooden were alive (the Wizard of Westwood basketball coach for those of you too young or ignorant to remember), he’d probably agree with me on this. Every football team, including the mighty Bruins, have at least one game in them every year they are not supposed to win, yet somehow rise up, play out of their minds and win anyway. This game, combined with a guaranteed letdown where usc will come out flat after an emotional win at Oregon, will be the game UCLA takes it all! Go Bruins!

  19. Occupy Fucla! How many people think there will be an Occupy USC? What a bunch of tools. Handouts, please. Just like SlobDusky.

  20. Guess we are saving our only complete game of the year for our last game. Hopefully there will be some nice still shots of M. Tyler straight arming Westgate and and Dye. M. Lee punking D. Riely, and R. Woods eating in front of the Weasel’s face…

    This will be the cherry on top of our season while the gutties prepare to lose against a M. West team in Las Vegas.

    Their bowl game will be televised against reruns of Cheers and guess who will draw higher ratings??

  21. OK, I thought this guy was legit earlier, but after this last post I KNOW WESTWOOD RULES is a TroBan imposter. Every UCLAn know Bill Wooden is the Wiseman of Westwood not the Wizard like some sort of carny sideshow necromancer.

  22. I think the Bruins really think they have a chance this year. But then again they think they have a chance every year, and point to their 1/12 year miracle at the Rose Bowl. The last time ucla won at the Coliseum was 1997.
    USC will not lose Saturday folks. John David Booty is not walking through that tunnel. It is best you just jump to doing what it is you do every year after the annual beatdown and start lauding your basketball program, and how you have won more (Womens) National Championships than any other school.

  23. Wow, this dude’s moniker is another level! The classic, Weasel experience from 09′! FTMFW!!!!!!!!!

  24. I loved Bill Wooden, but alas, the Emperor of Westweird was proven to have no clothes.

    USC had better guard against overconfidence and complacency… going into the 2006 matchup I thought there was no way the baby bears could even muster a modicum of resistance, but a CJ Gable fumble and JD Booty’s lack of playmaking caused a vastly superior USC team to open the door for Florida and the SEC run that’s gone on ever since.

    FIGHT ON!

  25. WESTWOOD RULES is my kind of Bruin fan. Brings back memories of the glory days when Golan Globus (first Jewish QB in the Pac-10) was throwing bombs to wide retriever Vladimir “Gazpacho” Gazpachinski. They were our Barkley/Woods combo package, back in the day.

  26. ‘ play poorly ‘ after the lucky win of your life … as you were actually choking like the dog you are Goatboy. Then whine and pout when you lose ( Stanford ) because you choked.
    Goatboy is a real treat … total classless bum

Comments are closed.