Where Will They Finish?

USC is 1st in all-time Rose Bowls and will probably always be. Where's UCLA? Isn't that their stadium? Where will they finish?

Fewer players, better class. Oh well just another year getting the best of the little gutties. Hey Lob, how is recruiting shapping up at Cerritos? And Fred, what does the class look like for the Matadors?

At the end of the day, SC will have a solid class even if its only 15.

Do you realize we have a deep D-line of redshirt freshmen? Check out 2 deeps right now. The future is not so bleak indeed.

2013 Su'a Cravens the next Troy Polamalu and KENNY BIGELOW, the next (sh*t well we never have had a HOF DT) but this kis is!

LEZGO!

Scott Wolf owns spedjones. See here:

Q: spedjones said:
Scottie - your predictions were comical the other day. Thank you. Nor for my question: You've made much of this "star average" thing lately to get your readers all riled up. But which would you choose - a high star rating with 15 recruits, or a slightly lower star rating with 25 recruits? For discussion purposes, compare Alabama's likely class with SC's.

A: Whether you sign 15 or 25, a recruiting class usually comes down to whether 4-5 players make a significant impact. Everyone else tends to be cannon fodder.
I'll use my own example: Stanford's 2008 recruiting class featured Andrew Luck, David DeCastro, Jonathan Martin, Chase Thomas and Delano Howell. It was was ranked 50th by Rivals.com.
But those five players make it one of the best recruiting classes in the nation in hindsight. So if USC chooses wisely and gets 5 impact players, it doesn't really matter what the size of the class is. Alabama's advantage is a greater margin for error with 25 recruits.

Bahahahahahahaha Wolf is your daddy, spud.

Troll on though...

Fite on, cause' We're #2 ! Shoudda been #1, wouldda been # 1 if not for the sanctions, couldaa been a lot worse though!
fite on LIMBO U!

Wow, SlopeSpic is angry. Or should I say crabby?