Prop. 13: Thirty years later


Howard Jarvis, tax fighter

Today, as I write this, (June 6) it is exactly 30 years since the voters approved the historic California tax-cutting measure Proposition 13.
What do you give for the 30th anniversary? Hmm, I know a lot of school teachers worried about layoffs who would like to give the voters a sack of coal.

I’ve been in California exactly as long as Proposition 13 has been around. Yup, I moved here from New York in August 1978 to attend Univeristy of California, Irvine and like many, I fell in love with SoCal and stayed. Today, it still feels like we’re living under the cloud of Prop. 13. Living here and reporting on communities in Orange, San Bernardino and now, Los Angeles County for almost those 30 years, I’ve seen and heard all sides of the property tax cutting measure.

My first experience was when I was still in New York. I got a phone call from my parents, who had heard from my brother, who had just joined the Los Angeles County sheriff’s department. He was worried, very worried, that if this ballot measure was to pass, he would be out of a job.

Well, that didn’t happen. In fact, in April, he retired from the department after 31 years of meritorious service.

Scare tactics were the first reaction to the measure. But California found a way (it was called reserves) to pay cities and schools for the shrinking property tax revenues. Then, as we saw in Tuesday’s Covina Utility Tax vote (Measure C, approved by 65 percent of the voters), the use of scare tactics to convince voters to vote for a tax is still in vogue.

Which brings me to my next point. Utility Users Taxes came about after Prop. 13, after the state stopped the bailouts and started taking some of the money back. Then property tax revenue bond began to appear on our property tax bills. Almost every school district has one, some have two on the rolls. When you add community college districts and some water districts, it, well, almost adds up to a pre-Prop. 13 tax bill.

The point is: other taxes have taken the place of lowered property taxes. It is the old step on the snake illustration; step on the tail and you haven’t killed the snake, you just fatten the head.

This entry was posted in environment, land use, Pasadena by Steve Scauzillo. Bookmark the permalink.

About Steve Scauzillo

I love journalism. I've been working in journalism for 32 years. I love communicating and now, that includes writing about environment, transportation and the foothill/Puente Hills communities of Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights, Walnut and Diamond Bar. I write a couple of columns, one on fridays in Opinion and the other, The Green Way, in the main news section. Send me ideas for stories. Or comments. I was opinion page editor for 12 years so I enjoy a good opinion now and then.

2 thoughts on “Prop. 13: Thirty years later

  1. ov7et1n-whdoqqd-tw6q600d-0 gambling|online casino gambling|internet casino gambling|gambling|casino games|online casino|gambling|casino|casinos|gambling|casino games|free casino games|gambling|online gambling|best online casino|gambling|free casino
    [url=]free poker|texas holdem|online poker|free poker|texas holdem|online poker|free poker|poker games|poker tables[/url]
    [ online gambling|online casino gambling|internet casino gambling|online gambling|casino games|online casino|online gambling|no deposit casinos|casino|online gambling|casino|casinos|online gambling|casino games|free casino games|online gambling]
    “auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|free online auto insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|car insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|free online auto insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes”:
    [LINK insurance|whole life insurance|whole life insurance policy|life insurance|online life insurance|life insurance leads|life insurance|whole life insurance policy|whole life insurance quotes|life insurance[/LINK]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.