12 thoughts on “Steve Sarkisian On Loss

  1. It looks like this guy was the most rattled in the whole team during the game not remembering a thing on what happened or what he did. I admit that I’m one of those who have overestimated him all this time, and now I wonder if Haden’s choosing this guy over Petersen was the right choice.

    • This was a Washington State bad level of loss.

      The defense was unprepared, sluggish, and lost just about every one-on-one match up throughout the game.

      Unfortunately, USC is stuck with Sark for at least through the 2016 season, if not through 2017.

      Sark teams at Washington had terrible defenses.

      Wilcox came from Boise State, so he is a Peterson “protoge”, but the tenor of a team comes from the head coach. Sark is soft. It looks like USC under Sark will be soft teams.

      Hopefully, Haden will be have retired and they will finally clear out the Athletic Department’s South Bay mafia that gave us Kiffin and Sark.

  2. He who fails to adapt ,and can’t learn from the past is doomed…no joy in troy…cognitive skills are a necessary part of ones life…

  3. Why bother with a “no-huddle” offense if the qb needs 15 seconds to read the play from the sidelines?

Comments are closed.